PlayerComparisons
International Vice-Captain
Two ATG matchwinners
Yeah, what he said.Simple answer. Better peak, better longevity, better SR, scored tons more often, more difficult home pitches, higher average.
Dravid has a better peak. Scored more daddy tons and impact knocks. And was better in the 90s before pitches flattened. So it is close between Dravid and Kallis.Simple answer. Better peak, better longevity, better SR, scored tons more often, more difficult home pitches, higher average.
R Dravid (IND) | 1996-1999 | 34 | 58 | 4 | 2698 | 190 | 49.96 | 6958 | 38.77 | 6 | 16 | 1 | 325 | 3 |
JH Kallis (SA) | 1995-1999 | 32 | 51 | 6 | 1849 | 148* | 41.08 | 5110 | 36.18 | 5 | 10 | 3 | 188 | 6 |
JH Kallis (ICC/SA) | 2000-2009 | 101 | 174 | 27 | 8630 | 189* | 58.70 | 18559 | 46.50 | 27 | 42 | 7 | 993 | 63 |
R Dravid (ICC/IND) | 2000-2009 | 103 | 179 | 23 | 8558 | 270 | 54.85 | 19676 | 43.49 | 22 | 42 | 7 | 1094 | 15 |
JH Kallis (SA) | 2010-2013 | 33 | 55 | 7 | 2810 | 224 | 58.54 | 5234 | 53.68 | 13 | 6 | 6 | 307 | 28 |
R Dravid (IND) | 2010-2012 | 27 | 49 | 5 | 2032 | 191 | 46.18 | 4624 | 43.94 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 235 | 3 |
Or a Kallis vs Jadeja thread. Maybe secondary skills only so it's closer.With repeatedly voting for Jadeja and Kallis in two kinda close threads, someone please make a better outside home Imran vs Ashwin thread for @subshakerz
Dravid's 148 vs Kallis 101 which was better ? (Their First Hundreds were the Best Hundreds in their Career)SA vs IND Cricket Scorecard, 3rd Test at Johannesburg, January 16 - 20, 1997
Get cricket scorecard of 3rd Test, SA vs IND, India tour of South Africa 1996/97 at New Wanderers Stadium, Johannesburg dated January 16 - 20, 1997.www.espncricinfo.com
AUS vs SA Cricket Scorecard, 1st Test at Melbourne, December 26 - 30, 1997
Get cricket scorecard of 1st Test, AUS vs SA, South Africa tour of Australia 1997/98 at Melbourne Cricket Ground dated December 26 - 30, 1997.www.espncricinfo.com
DravidDravid's 148 vs Kallis 101 which was better ?
Pretty sure Dravid 180 vs Aus is that.Dravid's 148 vs Kallis 101 which was better ? (Their First Hundreds were the Best Hundreds in their Career)
3rd Position | 1996-2012 | 134 | 219 | 20 | 10524 | 270 | 52.88 | 24598 | 42.78 | 28 | 50 | 8 | 1311 | 19 |
4th Position | 2000-2013 | 109 | 170 | 24 | 9033 | 224 | 61.86 | 18256 | 49.47 | 35 | 36 | 10 | 1023 | 69 |
Dravid’s best 100 was the 148 in Headingley in 2002. It was very challenging swinging conditions and a good bowling attack in Caddick, Flintoff, Hoggard and Tudor. He got India into a position where Tendulkar and Ganguly could cash in and it was a historic victory (first by India in England in 17 years).Pretty sure Dravid 180 vs Aus is that.
And Kallis 101* is better than Dravid 148.
Tbf I wouldn't exactly want either in my ODI team if it's ATG level.....Test
Kallis > Dravid
ODIs
Dravid > Kallis
One more Ajay Jadeja = Dravid out of 90s Indian team.Tbf I wouldn't exactly want either in my ODI team if it's ATG level.....
Nah, Ganguly was a very fine ODI batsman, he is definitely ahead; as is Kumble (not counting Azhar).One more Ajay Jadeja = Dravid out of 90s Indian team.
Kallis would have been 2nd best player in 90s Indian team..(Galaxies ahead of Robin Singh.)
In their primary skills.. Yes. ( Jadeja and Srinath too)Nah, Ganguly was a very fine ODI batsman, he is definitely ahead; as is Kumble (not counting Azhar).