• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Jack Hobbs vs Ravindra Jadeja (technique)

Who has the better test batting technique?


  • Total voters
    18

HouHsiaoHsien

International Debutant
Man Hobbs would think averaging 60 in the time people struggled to average 35 would label him an ATG. Leave alone dominating the era after that as well(WW 1), and having a perfect record across sticky wickets, bouncing conditions, the infamous gluepot wicket, matted wickets(and being the first to dominate googly bowlers). Further several 500+ run series(something that people hold agaisnt SRT). But no, Hobbs wouldn’t do **** today, but Steve Smith and Tendulkar would still dominate on the pre WW1 wickets with their technique. Smh at this tomfoolery
 

Top