• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Inzi a Coward

Sehwag309

Banned
Atkinson sets the record straight

Faisal Shariff in Lahore | April 02, 2004 21:57 IST
Last Updated: April 02, 2004 22:12 IST


"Inzamam (ul Haq) asked me to cut the grass off the wicket in Multan," says Andy Atkinson, the English curator currently under fire for preparing a batsman-friendly pitch in Multan for the first Test, which Pakistan lost by an innings and 52 runs on day five to give India its first Test win on Pakistani soil.

Numerous stories have been doing the rounds about the placid nature of the tracks, and how they have blunted the edge of the Pakistani fast bowlers - with much of the blame falling on the curator.

Atkinson told rediff.com that he is being made the scapegoat in a conflict of interest between bowlers and batsmen belonging to the home team.

The bowlers want grass on the wicket and seaming conditions to help them, while the team management wants a batting track, he said.

In a bid to clear the air, Atkinson mentioned three key points:

First, he pointed out, no one from the Pakistan Cricket Board had pulled him up for bad preparation of the Multan pitch.

Second, he says, it was skipper Inzamam-ul Haq and team manager Haroon Rashid who asked him to shave the grass off the wicket.

"Inzy has met me just twice in this series, once when I congratulated him for the Karachi hundred and the second time when he asked me to shave the wicket off the grass. He can't look me in the eye. He is a coward," said Atkinson, fuming over how the Pakistan team had put him on the spot.

"He [Inzamam] was unhappy about the Peshawar wicket also, because I gave some juice to it and it seamed around a bit. He made sure after that to have wickets with no seam movement. He just wanted hard and bouncy tracks for his fast bowlers," he added.

After the first day's play at Multan, Inzamam told television channel Sahara Samay that he would never play on such tracks again. He said he had scored two centuries at Multan earlier also, and though those wickets were not a bowler's paradise, they were not as bad as this one.

Five days later, Inzamam did a back flip and said it was unfair to blame the wickets. He told the media that Pakistan had been winning on the same kind of tracks for the last 14-15 years.

Interestingly, what had been put out was that it was vice-captain Yousuf Youhanna who asked for the grass to be cut. There was even speculation that Youhanna had done that because of worry over his own form with the bat.

No, says Atkinson, adding that he is yet to meet the Multan centurion during this series.

"I can't be blamed. After all I didn't bowl long hops and half volleys. I didn't get run out with the bat in the wrong hand," he said, criticizing the Pakistani bowling performance and the run-out of Inzamam for a duck in the crucial second innings of the Test.

Atkinson said he had not been briefed about the kind of pitch required for the Lahore Test, starting April 5.

Clarifying rumors that he had been summoned to the Pakistan dressing room and given a dressing down for the nature of the pitch, Atkinson said, "I had asked for a meeting with Rameez Raja to ask him what kind of wickets they wanted to prepare. I told him about the two contrasting briefs the captain and bowlers gave me about the wicket."

Negating another rumor, Atkinson said he had flown down to Lahore on his own initiative, midway through the first Test, and that his trip there was not at the behest of anyone from the PCB.

Atkinson's fury is perhaps understandable - following India's win in the one-day series and the even more remarkable win in the first Test of the three-day series, Atkinson has copped the most blame from the local media and fans alike. The public perception has been that the tracks prepared gave the advantage to the Indian batsmen over the Pakistan bowlers.

And despite the storm of criticism, not once did any PCB official or Pakistan team member defend the curator.

It's time, Atkinson said, to set the record straight.
 

Salamuddin

International Debutant
As a bowler you don't always get conditions that suit you.

The key is how well you can adapt.
India's much maligned bowling attack proved that getting 20 wickets on that track was possible.
So Atkinson has a point when he says that Pakistan's more celebrated bowlers need to have a good long hard look at their performance.
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
I've seen some doctored wickets in my time - but it's usually a case of trying to negate a pace threat, promoting spin, that sort of thing.

To remove seam movement from a wicket yet maintain bounce just by shaving the grass seems to me a bit of a hit-and-miss affair, and I'm not convinced that it would have worked particularly well, especially if the surface is hard and dry anyway.

But then again, I'm no groundsman.
 

Kenny

U19 Debutant
What I don't get is that with bowlers like Shoaib and Sami in his arsenal - very swift bowlers you might say, why would Inzamam want the grass shaved off the pitch?
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
Kenny said:
What I don't get is that with bowlers like Shoaib and Sami in his arsenal - very swift bowlers you might say, why would Inzamam want the grass shaved off the pitch?
Agreed - makes very little sense.
 

indianreligion

School Boy/Girl Captain
luckyeddie said:
Agreed - makes very little sense.
imran's version of it is that after seeing irfan pathan in smashing form as opposed to his bowlers, and knowing that multan is, in general, a batsmen friendly wicket, he thought that if they clicked with the bat, they would not lose.

imran goes on to say that as soon as inzy decided on a batsman friendly pitch, there were only ways in which the game would go...
1/a win for india
2/a draw

(times sport...the times of india)

p.s.before the pak tour, in an interview with rajdeep sardesai on ndtv sourav had said - "if u aim for a draw, u will lose"
 

Rich2001

International Captain
indianreligion said:
"if u aim for a draw, u will lose"
Spot on, you shouldn't even be in the game if you go out to play with that attitude, you always go out to win and if things start going bad to modify your game plan to hold out.
 
SHOCKING!

Shame on Inzi, Shame on Pak team. Its unfortunate to see Pak playing like tigers against teams like Banglkadesh and other depleted sides, but when faced againt a quality outfit like India, they simply don't have the balls to stand on their toes!
 

Tom Halsey

International Coach
Re: SHOCKING!

ajaagarkarajaaja said:
Shame on Inzi, Shame on Pak team. Its unfortunate to see Pak playing like tigers against teams like Banglkadesh and other depleted sides, but when faced againt a quality outfit like India, they simply don't have the balls to stand on their toes!
So, India are the best team in the world, Pakistan are scared of them, etc.

True, Pakistan don't seem to have much clue where they are going at the moment, but India are far from being a quality outfit.

Quality batting, bowling lets them down.
 

Umair316

Cricket Spectator
These are just the rumors spreading in the media like a wildfire.
I remember during the 1st test match, Atkins mentioned that it was Youhana who asked to shave of the grass, and now he is turning corners and putting the blame on Inzi.
Whatever the pitch conditions were, Pakistan had absolute no excuse to lose.
Even if the pitch was good for batting, the Pakistani were good enough to challenge the total of 675, which was compiled due to irresponsible captaincy and fielding.
 

V Reddy

International Debutant
Re: Re: Re: SHOCKING!

wahindiawah said:
Yeah, like it let India down in Australia and then in Multan in recent times:rolleyes:
Erm.. It succeeded in Multan but was nowhere near successful in Aus. If you think they were successful in Aus then for a person who is so ****y about Indian Cricket , you have set very low standards !!!!!
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Re: Re: Re: SHOCKING!

wahindiawah said:
Yeah, like it let India down in Australia and then in Multan in recent times:rolleyes:
Actually, that was basically Kumble in all honesty - Pathan took a few in Multan, but apart from that the strength isn't really there.
 

shankar

International Debutant
Re: Re: Re: Re: SHOCKING!

marc71178 said:
Actually, that was basically Kumble in all honesty - Pathan took a few in Multan, but apart from that the strength isn't really there.
In Australia it was Kumble who did the damage most of the time. But Ajit bowled a match-winning spell. Pathan bowled well in his 2 matches. Zaheer (who had taken a 5 wicket haul in the 1'st match) and Harbhajan were injured.
 

Top