I think it's more of the boards not wanting to undertake the expense rather than the players 'doing it for free', as the players are under contract anyways.Would players give up the time required and do it essentially for free ( which is actually losing money, because it is potential earning time not realised) ? Although I could really get behind an U21 T20 tournament.
That's what happens at the Asian Games isn't it? Quite a failure imo and not a great way to show the world what Cricket is all about.Perhaps they could introduce it as an 'amateur' sport at the Olympics. None of the nations send in their contracted players. Except Pakistan who get to send in their best team because their players behave and train like amateurs anyway.
There's something called Asian Games??
There's something called Asian Games??
They play games in Asia???We have cricket at the Asian Games??
Advent Children is a movie you n00b
Yeah, but vast majority of world cricketers earnings are via match fees which is banned at the olympics. Ergo if a team is playing Olympics when it could be playing JAMODI series the players would be losing money.I think it's more of the boards not wanting to undertake the expense rather than the players 'doing it for free', as the players are under contract anyways.
I would definitely be in favour of a U21 or even U19 tournament though.
Had no ideaYeah, but vast majority of world cricketers earnings are via match fees which is banned at the olympics. Ergo if a team is playing Olympics when it could be playing JAMODI series the players would be losing money.