Lillee is arguably a top 10 bowler, No way Botham is better with that disastrous 2nd half.personally voted Botham, very big match winner.
last 15 tests really, after the rib injury in Australia in 86 that was that for him, though, I think I put great value in all rounders.Lillee is arguably a top 10 bowler, No way Botham is better with that disastrous 2nd half.
I think Lillee is likely nearly as a good as Hadlee McGrath except not enough opportunities away.personally voted Botham, very big match winner.
Think I'd disagree with that.I think Lillee is likely nearly as a good as Hadlee McGrath except not enough opportunities away.
Why? What did Lillee lack skillwise to not warrant that comparison?Think I'd disagree with that.
AgreeI prefer most ATG batsmen & bowlers over Botham and Kapil
Skillwise, he's better than McGrath.Why? What did Lillee lack skillwise to not warrant that comparison?
Hadlee himself took Lillee as his skill standard.
Yeah folks here underrate him honestly.Skillwise, he's better than McGrath.
A tearaway at the begining of his career, then reduced his pacet and turned into a craftman. Could swing and seam the bowl both ways, had cutters in his armory; very similar to Hadlee.
Agree.Yeah folks here underrate him honestly.
He had the skills not the returns. Remember:Skillwise, he's better than McGrath.
A tearaway at the begining of his career, then reduced his pace and turned into a craftsman. Could swing and seam the bowl both ways, had cutters in his armory; very similar to Hadlee.
It's perpetually hilarious how Lillee flunks both analysis by checklist and standardised averages.
That's what Subz said. Nothing about the returns here.He had the skills.
Yeah. I just don't think having the skills means much without the returns.That's what Subz said. Nothing about the returns here.
Yeah, go suck a jellyfish.Yeah. I just don't think having the skills means much without the returns.