Well not all the blame can be aimed at GB he didn't collect any of the sides and it's not like a few erros like if a bowler is medium fast or medium is going to make much difference.Originally posted by Graham
There should be some consistency between the info on the 4 day team pages and OD team pages. I notice that some bowlers are fast medium at FC yet medium at OD. Some players do not bowl in FC yet bowl in OD. And if a player can keep in OD surely he can keep in FC also. Victoria's info is the most inconsistent example.
[Edited on 4/10/2002 by Graham]
Ok sorry just re-read my post and it has been worded, not as i intened, i didn't mean to sound ungreatful. What I was trying to say was that GB let managers collect their own teams so mistake were always going to be made, and GB just passed the info onto me with the needed info for me to paste stright onto the site....Originally posted by Graham
My comment was supposed to be constructive, not intended to rub you up the wrong way. I was asked to point things out and that's what I did. I realise that team managers researched much of the information.
Fast - Medium - SpinOriginally posted by Graham
Good point. By the way, what categories of pace does VCM4 have?
IMO I would say they are still both medium, I would only class players such as Lee/Aktar/bond etc as fast bowlersOriginally posted by Graham
So I take it that fast/medium would be classified as fast whereas medium/fast would be classified as medium?