• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Chose one player : Lara or Kallis

Choose one


  • Total voters
    20

DrWolverine

International Debutant
A genie gives you a wish. Depending on your choice, your team will get a player who will be just as good as Lara or Kallis in batting, bowling and fielding.
 

Sliferxxxx

U19 Cricketer
Kallis. Negligibly worst batsman but great fielder and decent 5th bowler. Matter of fact, Kallis over all specialists. Only cricketers with better value are: Don, Sobers, Hadlee, and Imran.
 

DrWolverine

International Debutant
Sanga averages just 40 as a wicket keeper batsman.

What benefit does he give me over Kallis who averages 55 with the ball and 32 with the ball?

What benefit does he give me over Hadlee who averages 22 with the ball and 27 with the ball?

It is the same with Gilly. I would rather have Knott as a wicket keeper and ATG batsman/bowler.

If I have to choose between Gilly and Kallis, I would rather have Kallis and semi decent WK bat.
 

Red_Ink_Squid

Global Moderator
I think Kallis is almost always going to be the better pick for a side which doesn't already have a Test quality top 6 batsmen who can handle fifth bowler duties. His slip catching is a great asset too (though Lara would improve a lot of sides there as well). Only if you've no need of an allrounder then you have the luxury to go for Lara's slightly better batting.
 

Top