• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Best overall batting performance at a WC in the '90s? (Crowe, M Waugh, Sachin, Aravinda, Klusener)

Best batting performance at WC in the 90s


  • Total voters
    12

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Still pretty bored in the Sydney lockdown, heh.

After a bit of thought I've narrowed it down to these 5 guys as having the 5 best batting performances at the WCs of the '90s.

disclaimer: Jayasuriya got Man of the series in '96 but looking at his record he really doesn't seem worthy of being here. He got 3 single figure scores and only 221 runs total @ 36. His strike rate was famously through the roof but I feel he only made an impact in 3 games(and only got MOM in 2). I feel his 7 wickets must have played a huge part in getting the Man of the series over Aravinda, who got 4 MOMs to his 2 including in the SF and F....



So let's look at these 5 performances - I've bolded where the player performed the best in each category - I will allow people to vote for what they deem the best 2


Martin Crowe - 3 MOMs, 456 runs @ 114 striking @ 90 with 4 fifties and 1 hundred (50+ scores = 5)

Mark Waugh - 3 MOMs, 484 runs @ 80 striking @ 85 with 1 fifty and 3 hundreds (50+ scores = 4)

Sachin Tendulkar - 2 MOMs, 523 runs @ 87 striking @ 85 with 3 fifties and 2 hundreds (50+ scores = 5)

Aravinda De Silva - 4 MOMs, 448 runs @ 89 striking @ 114, 2 fifties and 2 hundreds (50+ scores = 4)

Lance Klusener - 3 MOMs, 281 runs @ 140 striking @ 122 with 2 fifties (50+ scores = 2)



So as we can see, Klusener had the highest average and the best strike rate, and his cameos down the order were super critical for South Africa. But he didn't even pass 300 runs let alone 400 like everyone else here. You can argue his runs meant extra due to it being such a low scoring cup, and it's not his fault he often batted at 9, but I feel his wickets played a decent part in his '99 WC being remembered so fondly and we aren't interested in that for this exercise.

Junior got the most tons, Sachin the most runs, Crowe was super consistent(with a terrific S/R for '92) and of course Aravinda got 4 MOM awards including in the SF and F

I'm gonna vote for Aravinda for his best performances coming at the business end, and Crowe for doing it all the way back in '92 when putting up those numbers in an ODI WC was unprecedented.
 
Last edited:

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Looking at it in a point system with 5 points for 1st, 4 points for 2nd etc

MOMs:

Aravinda - 5
Klusener/Crowe/Waugh - 4
Sachin - 1

Runs:

Sachin - 5
Waugh - 4
Crowe - 3
Aravinda - 2
Klusener - 1

Average:

Klusener - 5
Crowe - 4
Aravinda - 3
Sachin - 2
Waugh - 1

Strike rate:

Klusener - 5
Aravinda - 4
Crowe - 3
Sachin/Waugh - 2

Fifties:

Crowe - 5
Sachin - 4
Aravinda/Klusener - 3
Waugh - 1

Hundreds:

Waugh - 5
Sachin/Aravinda - 4
Crowe - 2
Klusener - 1

50+ scores:

Crowe/Sachin - 5
Waugh/Aravinda - 3
Klusener - 1


Overall points:

Crowe - 26
Aravinda - 24
Sachin - 23
Waugh/Klusener - 20
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
^the above post has given me an idea. i'm gonna apply that points for different categories systems for test careers and see what I conjure up
 

Migara

International Coach
Issue here is only Aravinda was in a winning side. That makes him set for #1.

Then it's Crowe, because his play was way modern than the era.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Aravinda played two great knocks in the semi and final, but that was it in 96 aside from some runs against minnows.

Crowe played a great knock in the semi but was consistently scoring through the cup against top opposition.
 

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
Aravinda played two great knocks in the semi and final, but that was it in 96 aside from some runs against minnows.
Played well in the league game against India too IIRC. And that was the only non minnow game they got in league round after Australia and West Indies declined to play in SL
 

Jayro

U19 12th Man
I mistakenly voted for Sachin as I thought, just by going through the title, that it was about overall best batting performance and it's no doubt in my mind was Sachin since he made it in more than one world cup which not many can boast of, otherwise the little cameos that Klusener produced has been unmatched with the value it put as a difference in winning Or losing a contest - he would just bat the other team out in a matter of five overs was just amazing and a sheer brand of cricket i dont think anybody has been able to emulate, you just need to go through those matches he won for SA in 1999 and the SF that they didn't he was just an amazing player.
 

Jayro

U19 12th Man
Looking at it in a point system with 5 points for 1st, 4 points for 2nd etc

MOMs:

Aravinda - 5
Klusener/Crowe/Waugh - 4
Sachin - 1

Runs:

Sachin - 5
Waugh - 4
Crowe - 3
Aravinda - 2
Klusener - 1

Average:

Klusener - 5
Crowe - 4
Aravinda - 3
Sachin - 2
Waugh - 1

Strike rate:

Klusener - 5
Aravinda - 4
Crowe - 3
Sachin/Waugh - 2

Fifties:

Crowe - 5
Sachin - 4
Aravinda/Klusener - 3
Waugh - 1

Hundreds:

Waugh - 5
Sachin/Aravinda - 4
Crowe - 2
Klusener - 1

50+ scores:

Crowe/Sachin - 5
Waugh/Aravinda - 3
Klusener - 1


Overall points:

Crowe - 26
Aravinda - 24
Sachin - 23
Waugh/Klusener - 20
A huge flaw in that system is - that you are giving repeated weightage to 50 + scores that's leaving a batting@number 8 match winner (Klusener) to lose a lot of leverage- you are counting 100s in one catagory, 50s in other and 50 + scores in yet another --- which I think makes it too redundant, at the most you could of counted 100's and 50s seperately - giving extra points for yet another 50+ catagory is like stretching to far out for a single dynamic in ODIs
 

Immenso

International Vice-Captain
Strike rates are hard to judge, as need to be compared to the era.

I've done this statsguru query. Filtered to remove the minnows (sorry 1990s Zim, even though you were good then by 1999)

Crowe 1992: 6th best SR of tournament
Aravinda 1996: 4th best SR of tournament
Sachin 1996: 6th best SR of tournament
M Waugh 1996: 7th best SR of tournament
Klusener 1999: 1st best SR of tournament

 

Immenso

International Vice-Captain
^^

While Inzamam does get some glory, more should also go to Moin.
Ranantunga under-rated in 1996
And Klusener should have batted higher in 1999, 5 not outs ..... out of 7 innings. Averaging 114 with the highest strike rate of the decade.

I'd probably have to go Klusener, based on the constraints within which he was used.
Followed by Crowe for quality plus quantity. Or maybe Aravinda for quality when it mattered, but less quantity (only 4 matches)
 

Top