Wow what a loserAnderson far and away the worst of them.
And the bestAnderson is the worst seam bowler ever in 100+ years of test history to take 700+ wickets.
Definitely not the worst for 400.And the best
But crucially, he’s also the worst for 600 and 500.
Think he might not be the worst for 400, and definitely not for 300.
I forgot that ****er had taken so many wickets. ****.Definitely not the worst for 400.
Hi Kapil
But are you saying Broad is better?
Is Kapil a HTB in your opinion?Definitely not the worst for 400.
Hi Kapil
But are you saying Broad is better?
Anderson is definitely better than Kapil even if it is marginally.Is Kapil a HTB in your opinion?
As bowlers it’s not marginalAnderson is definitely better than Kapil even if it is marginally.
Lol . How much did he average in the recent Ashes series and current Indian series?As bowlers it’s not marginal
Took more wickets in them than Kapil iirc.Lol . How much did he average in the recent Ashes series and current Indian series?
good but not great wickets per Test, most top bowlers retire well before longevity gives them records of "most" but recency effect will mean he's placed in lofty standing against better English bowlers.....700 seamer club is a group of plodders tbh
seen a dig at Bairstow, "worst player ever to reach 100 caps" - you don't get to 100 caps by being a terrible player, he may not be as great as most or all but it's a rather silly way of swiping at JB - and he played more innings as a batsman keeper than just batsman, being moved up and down the order, given gloves and then taken away etc was bound to knock his average a bit.Anderson is the worst seam bowler ever in 100+ years of test history to take 700+ wickets.
Woakes took more wickets than bothTook more wickets in them than Kapil iirc.
are you related to Bairstow or someone close to him?seen a dig at Bairstow, "worst player ever to reach 100 caps" - you don't get to 100 caps by being a terrible player, he may not be as great as most or all but it's a rather silly way of swiping at JB - and he played more innings as a batsman keeper than just batsman, being moved up and down the order, given gloves and then taken away etc was bound to knock his average a bit.
averages 38 at #5 and #6 as a Batsman, 40 at #6 and #7 as a keeper, for those can't come to terms with WHY he got picked a lot....
may take a few decades before anyone plays like 20 (?) years as a quick and gets 600 let alone 700 Test wickets, very good bowler no doubt but 3.74 wickets per Test average shows longevity has been more of a factor than brilliance, sure he has his Tests where he rips up sides but "only" 32 5wi and a more telling/lacking THREE 10wm is a Test-ament to that
Botham 27x 5wi and 4x 10wm (in 85 less Tests)
Hadlee 36x 5wi and 9x 10wm (in 101 less Tests)
Steyn 26x 5wi and 5x 10wm (in 94 less Tests)
could probably go on, find a lot more who would have got to 700 had they played for 20+ years, not forgetting injury 'fortune' that playing 20+ years and 9.5 Tests a year average takes durability, his type probably helped ie not out and out pace
I would consider a batsman who averages 10+ more at home or a bowler who averages 5+ less at home to be a HTB.Is Kapil a HTB in your opinion?