They kind of have with only ten teams in a supposed world cup which for me has devalued the event immensely.This tournament (and esp the last three days) has reminded by how compelling 50 over cricket can be and how much better it is than crap t20s. That’s all. The administrators had better not screw this up.
I think the format of this tournament is terrible but 50 over cricket itself is still pretty great.Two wonderfully close games and I think today’s still goes down as a cracker.
Honestly even in the ‘still no close games’ on phase I was enjoying the non-England aspects of the tournament. Been some incredible performances and a game that lasts 100 overs doesn’t have to have a close finish to have been close along the way.
I know some are concerned about dead rubbers etc but I’ll cross that bridge if we get there. I’ve enjoyed this WC so far aside from the obvious. And that’s coming from someone whois very much my team first.
I’d have smaller groups, more knockout games.I think the format of this tournament is terrible but 50 over cricket itself is still pretty great.
15 teams (3 pools of 5) and a super 6 then straight to final.I’d do 12-14 teams and a super 6
It is quite a stylish trophy, I'll give you that.This is still the best trophy to win in cricket, I really hope some of the players don't get their way and for it to fizzle out
well probably have the hundred and t10 world cups in 20 years timeGive it a few years. It will be reborn again. As soon as the number of balls per innings in a match approaches 1.
In <10 years, the Hundred will be obsolete.well probably have the hundred and t10 world cups in 20 years time
****, it'll be the Fifty?In <10 years, the Hundred will be obsolete.