Story of my life in every World Cup game. Every single one.Heart says NZ, head says India
True. And 'favourites' tag don't meant much in T20. Cricinfo going a bit overboard with "World T20 India's tournament to lose". They were the favourites last time too when they lost to Sri Lanka.India is being hyped up too much. They are not nearly as invincible as they are made out to be. Nehra and Pandya might be thrashed on any given day. Once Kohli fails, the others can fall like a pack of cards. As long as they are in form, all well and good. But can`t be that case always.
India are maybe a little over-dependent on Kohli in ODIs but in t20s, this side is not dependent on anybody, for my money. There's someone to step up when someone else fails.India is being hyped up too much. They are not nearly as invincible as they are made out to be. Nehra and Pandya might be thrashed on any given day. Once Kohli fails, the others can fall like a pack of cards. As long as they are in form, all well and good. But can`t be that case always.
I think so as well, rightful favourites, but as the hammering the Saffers gave them last year, they are far from invincible.India is being hyped up too much. They are not nearly as invincible as they are made out to be. Nehra and Pandya might be thrashed on any given day. Once Kohli fails, the others can fall like a pack of cards. As long as they are in form, all well and good. But can`t be that case always.
Despite the likely conditions Hesson was leaning against playing all three spinners, given India's familiarity. It means the veteran Nathan McCullum could miss the cut with Mitchell Santner likely to be joined by legspinner Ish Sodhi. "He [Sodhi] certainly offers the ability for us to take wickets through the middle so he's a definite option for us."
The quicks are even more of a head-scratcher. The speedy Adam Milne appears the only certainty, with Hesson saying: "Adam has probably been our top T20 bowler for the last 12 months and done that in all conditions."
Mitchell McClenaghan hasn't yet hit his straps after his facial fracture layoff, which leaves Tim Southee and Trent Boult. Hesson and Williamson may have to decide between the senior pace pairing if Grant Elliott plays, which he probably should to strengthen the batting and bowl his tricky medium pacers which will be effective in the conditions.
We are being waaaay over hyped. This is a pretty decent side with everyone in good form in the recent past. But we are very very very easily beatable.
That's the thing with this format though isn't it. I think anyone is easily beatable on any given day. South Africa thrashed away, India thrashed Australia away, Australia thrashed South Africa away. Make sense of that nowI think so as well, rightful favourites, but as the hammering the Saffers gave them last year, they are far from invincible.
I read a Cricinfo report talking about boundary ropes being "refreshingly deep" in the qualifying round, so that sounds good for Jav and I'd hope his bowling IQ can come to the fore. Maybe even NZ's leading tournament wicket-taker at 16/1.Jav would probably be better under pressure and offers more stability with the bat.
Close to my side, but I'd bat Santner ahead of Ronchi, Milne ahead of Sodhi and wouldn't play Eillott.They're playing on a dust bowl with 0 grass by the sounds of it, surely would be silly to take 3 specialists seamers and 2 spinners considering what happened in those SA games last year? Southee and Boult are hardly untouchable on current form, I'd go;
Guppy
KW
Munro
Taylor
Anderson
Ronchi
Santner/Elliott
McCullum
Sodhi
Milne
Boult
Santner fighting it out with Elliott, Jav would probably be better under pressure and offers more stability with the bat.
Nah, need our superstar to concentrate on his bread and butter.I'm surprised no-one's suggested Munro to keep yet.