Bijed
International Regular
Not that it really matters since it worked well, but I'm not entirely sure why we put Woakes in at 3 and didn't just go with Stokes at that point, given that he'd be typically next in when you factor in the injuries? His relatively stodgy starting surely wouldn't have been a problem as a) we'd had a good partnership, so it's not like he was coming in against the new ball/fully fresh attack; and b) he'd have plenty of time to play himself in so a few dot balls wouldn't really have mattered. Maybe they just wanted him at 4 as, assuming a worst-case scenario where Roy and Morgan can't play in the next match, that's presumably where he'll be batting?
OTOH Woakes at 3 was kinda fun in it's own way
OTOH Woakes at 3 was kinda fun in it's own way
Last edited: