Well! This is very tough question to rate them we've to choose best, better and good bowler.
If we look at Imran he was a player not only a bowler but also batsman and he brought passion in cricket. His average at peak was just under 15. None can touch at their time of peak to his avg. He had the ability to change the situation of game at any time when he wished. Waqar's avg at his peak was under 21 but is strike rate was marvelous 38 none can touch this strike rate. He was speedstar before Shoaib's arrival. He was the master of swing and reverse swing yorker. Wasim's avg at his peak was under 20. He was the bowler who lifted Fast bowling after Lillee, Marshal and Imran. His run was short but his action was very excellent and versatile. He could bowl at any state of game. His achievement in WC 92 cannot be forgotten.
Wasim picked more wickets in test and Odi but in my point of view Imran and Waqar superior than Wasim.
Mine sequence would be
Imran > Waqar > Wasim.
If we look at Imran he was a player not only a bowler but also batsman and he brought passion in cricket. His average at peak was just under 15. None can touch at their time of peak to his avg. He had the ability to change the situation of game at any time when he wished. Waqar's avg at his peak was under 21 but is strike rate was marvelous 38 none can touch this strike rate. He was speedstar before Shoaib's arrival. He was the master of swing and reverse swing yorker. Wasim's avg at his peak was under 20. He was the bowler who lifted Fast bowling after Lillee, Marshal and Imran. His run was short but his action was very excellent and versatile. He could bowl at any state of game. His achievement in WC 92 cannot be forgotten.
Wasim picked more wickets in test and Odi but in my point of view Imran and Waqar superior than Wasim.
Mine sequence would be
Imran > Waqar > Wasim.