• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ken Barrington vs Rahul Dravid

Barrington vs Dravid


  • Total voters
    22

capt_Luffy

International Coach
Obviously there were a few good moments, but underwhelming overall imo and indicative of limitations.
As I said, imo the moments are quite handful to term "few" and overall it's perfectly fine. Even if there were any limitations, don't think his Australia record really presents that.
 

Johan

Cricketer Of The Year
Hundreds against Australia and South Africa from that generation of Indian Cricketers (1996-2013)

Sachin Tendulkar – 15 (97 innings)

Virender Sehwag – 8 (66 innings)
VVS Laxman – 7 (85 innings)
Mohammad Azharuddin – 5 (21 innings) [mostly home bullying]
Rahul Dravid – 4 (102 innings)
 

capt_Luffy

International Coach
Yeah I think it does too. Dravid for me is an ATG. At that level, this is an issue. Just for reference, as good as all of them might be, Dravid scored a total of 4 hundreds vs Aus/Sa, his teammate Sachin scored 18! And that's after he struggled against SA a bit at home.
As I said, I simply don't view Centuries as a make or break, given the list of valuable innings he has played.
 

PlayerComparisons

International Captain
Everything about his record suggests he was one of the best ever even if he was very boring.

He has 4 500+ run series.
Twice against Australia.(Home & Away)
Once against India.(Away)
Once against South Africa.(Away)

He played 3 or more tests in a series 16 times.
Scored 300+ runs 11 times.
A very consistent performer
Dravid has a bunch of great series and innings too. They both averaged under 35 against one good pace attack.
 

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
In August 1959 a publication from Lahore posed the question of who was then the world's greatest batsman. It provided a short-list of five: May, Cowdrey, O'Neill, Hanif and Sobers. The conclusion was:

This honour for the moment lies between Garfield Sobers and Hanif Mohammad. As a run-getting machine Hanif wins. As an exhibitionist, in the true cricketing sense, Garfield Sobers claims the honour.

source: peterhrt
In August 1959, O'Neill had played five Tests and scored a total of 282 Test runs.

None of these Tests had been against Pakistan, so - notwithstanding the stellar early FC performance which had garnered him that infamous "new Bradman" tag - someone must have sent some really positive reports to Lahore for them to immediately designate him one of the world's top five batsmen.
 

Johan

Cricketer Of The Year
It wasn't that they had to have debuted post-war, it was based on post-war performances. Hutton and Compton were both picked, as both played most of their Test cricket post-war.
this will be an interesting topic actually, if people give precedence to debut date or to majority of career
 

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
this will be an interesting topic actually, if people give precedence to debut date or to majority of career
Unless it's specified that a player must have debuted in the period in question, I've got no issue with selecting players who played most of their cricket during the timeframe - I always pick Hutton and Compton in my England post-war XI.

In the same vein, if selecting a 1990-2025 world XI, I'm not leaving Sachin out because he debuted in '89.
 

Top