Johan
Cricketer Of The Year
wasn't a jab at you lol, just randomly hating on Javed is fun.Don't think I rate Miandad much higher than Clive Lloyd. Don't know how that's unfair.
wasn't a jab at you lol, just randomly hating on Javed is fun.Don't think I rate Miandad much higher than Clive Lloyd. Don't know how that's unfair.
Respectable.wasn't a jab at you lol, just randomly hating on Javed is fun.
As I said, imo the moments are quite handful to term "few" and overall it's perfectly fine. Even if there were any limitations, don't think his Australia record really presents that.Obviously there were a few good moments, but underwhelming overall imo and indicative of limitations.
I think it does, and I like Dravid.As I said, imo the moments are quite handful to term "few" and overall it's perfectly fine. Even if there were any limitations, don't think his Australia record really presents that.
Yeah I think it does too. Dravid for me is an ATG. At that level, this is an issue. Just for reference, as good as all of them might be, Dravid scored a total of 4 hundreds vs Aus/Sa, his teammate Sachin scored 18! And that's after he struggled against SA a bit at home.I think it does, and I like Dravid.
As I said, I simply don't view Centuries as a make or break, given the list of valuable innings he has played.Yeah I think it does too. Dravid for me is an ATG. At that level, this is an issue. Just for reference, as good as all of them might be, Dravid scored a total of 4 hundreds vs Aus/Sa, his teammate Sachin scored 18! And that's after he struggled against SA a bit at home.
Dravid has a bunch of great series and innings too. They both averaged under 35 against one good pace attack.Everything about his record suggests he was one of the best ever even if he was very boring.
He has 4 500+ run series.
Twice against Australia.(Home & Away)
Once against India.(Away)
Once against South Africa.(Away)
He played 3 or more tests in a series 16 times.
Scored 300+ runs 11 times.
A very consistent performer
He did. When Graveney chose his post-war England XI in 1982, he selected a 3-4-5 of May-Compton-Cowdrey. Kenny was nowhere to be seen.I'm pretty sure Tom Graveny rated Cowdrey above Barrington too.
Compton? but he debuted in 1930sHe did. When Graveney chose his post-war England XI in 1982, he selected a 3-4-5 of May-Compton-Cowdrey. Kenny was nowhere to be seen.
In August 1959, O'Neill had played five Tests and scored a total of 282 Test runs.In August 1959 a publication from Lahore posed the question of who was then the world's greatest batsman. It provided a short-list of five: May, Cowdrey, O'Neill, Hanif and Sobers. The conclusion was:
This honour for the moment lies between Garfield Sobers and Hanif Mohammad. As a run-getting machine Hanif wins. As an exhibitionist, in the true cricketing sense, Garfield Sobers claims the honour.
source: peterhrt
It wasn't that they had to have debuted post-war, it was based on post-war performances. Hutton and Compton were both picked, as both played most of their Test cricket post-war.Compton? but he debuted in 1930s
this will be an interesting topic actually, if people give precedence to debut date or to majority of careerIt wasn't that they had to have debuted post-war, it was based on post-war performances. Hutton and Compton were both picked, as both played most of their Test cricket post-war.
Unless it's specified that a player must have debuted in the period in question, I've got no issue with selecting players who played most of their cricket during the timeframe - I always pick Hutton and Compton in my England post-war XI.this will be an interesting topic actually, if people give precedence to debut date or to majority of career