Because Bumrah didn't bowl at 3-11 bowling position.Bowling position has got nothing to do with it. Also, how do you have shami and not Bumrah in a list of the best old ball pacers?
Yeah, the methodology here is flawed. Cricinfo simply doesn't have the requisite data of when exactly during the life of a ball bowlers are using it, except for who gets the first 2 overs of a fresh new ball. Everything after that can't be determined by simple bowling position.Because Bumrah didn't bowl at 3-11 bowling position.
So he is not present in this list
Well they do have the data for more recent matches. But ofc you’d have to manually collect and organise it.Yeah, the methodology here is flawed. Cricinfo simply doesn't have the requisite data of when exactly during the life of a ball bowlers are using it, except for who gets the first 2 overs of a fresh new ball. Everything after that can't be determined by simple bowling position.
Even with the bottle caps and the umpires Wasim was still better.Bottlecap Imran
He was more skilled but Imran was more effective.Even with the bottle caps and the umpires Wasim was still better.
Imran vs Akram in a nutshellHe was more skilled but Imran was more effective.
Probably Imran cos someone would shoot him out of the nutshellImran vs Akram in a nutshell