Bigger but not by enough margin to make it a good comparison.One of these things is bigger than the others.
One of these things just doesn’t belong.
Bigger but not by enough margin to make it a good comparison.One of these things is bigger than the others.
One of these things just doesn’t belong.
iirc he’d regularly bowl over 140 earlier in his careerI always thought Pollock’s speed was in the low 80s even during his peak (like Anderson)
Na, I remember him bowling an entire over at 144.x in (I think) 1999, and generally looked a bit quicker earlier career. It wasn't memorable for being quick by his standards (I remember him clocked a bit quicker), but cos of how consistent it was. Which means he was bowling within himself.I always thought Pollock’s speed was in the low 80s even during his peak (like Anderson)
Because people have a misconception that faster = better and so if a bowler is not well renowned for their pace its a good way to try and discredit them.People think McGrath was a "medium pacer" too. It nonsense, where people get these perceptions.
I mean, at the extremes it's kind of true. You can't bowl 110 kph pies as a seamer at Test level and not get **** on.Because people have a misconception that faster = better and so if a bowler is not well renowned for their pace its a good way to try and discredit them.
His average was low 130sI mean, at the extremes it's kind of true. You can't bowl 110 kph pies as a seamer at Test level and not get **** on.
But the truth is McGrath just objectively wasn't on the slower end of seam bowlers, which is what "medium pace", or even medium-fast would imply. He wasn't "fast", but "fast-medium". He was clocked at over 140. That's pretty typical for a Test class seamer, but nowhere near "medium pace".
McGrath was high 120s to towards the end.From what I remember
McGrath bowled mostly in 130s
Pollock bowled in 130s but was touching even high 120s times at the end of his career
When you think of a fast bowler, you tend to think of aggressive and attacking bowlers and not bowlers who bowls less than 80mph.Because people have a misconception that faster = better
Steyn and Wasim at their peaks were mainly mid 80s who could crank it up.When you think of a fast bowler, you tend to think of aggressive and attacking bowlers and not bowlers who bowls less than 80mph.
I accept that as long as you get wickets it should not matter much but pure pace excites majority of fans.
that's not even close to being true.Pollock started as an outright fast bowler.
It is. Watch clips of him in 95. He was he genuinely fast and then almost immediately took his pace down for accuracy.that's not even close to being true.
How quick does a bowler need to be to be classified as fast in your opinion? Nobody is calling him express.that's not even close to being true.
don't care for the classification. pollock wasn't outright fast bowler.How quick does a bowler need to be to be classified as fast in your opinion? Nobody is calling him express.