Langeveldt
Soutie
Love them or Loathe them??
At least Aussies now know what a "chav" is...
At least Aussies now know what a "chav" is...
Langeveldt said:At least Aussies now know what a "chav" is...
Love their noise. I wish they'd come up with some proper songs instead of sticking to boring, universal soccer chants, though.Langeveldt said:I love the way cricket has attracted "The masses" - But can't stand their noise, why do they have to chant like they're watching football?
I was thinking that about the stump mikes. FX?Langeveldt said:Sky had the FX mikes turned up waaay too high.. It was like being in a pub
They started out as tennis supporters, what do you expect. Singing at the cricket is just wrong. Cricket Australia commissioned Greg Champion to come up with songs to combat the barmy army, thankfully I haven't heard any of his work, there's no doubt they would be cringeworthy to begin with but after they have been been through the censors at CA, I shudder at the thought.UncleTheOne said:The Fanatics? Pfffttt. Amateurs.
One too many rums?superkingdave said:It made me chuckle after lunch when Holding was commentating and they were talking about the fanatics but Mikey kept referring to them as the fantastics
Yeah. I don't mind them or the noise, though I usually associate the songs and so on more with ODI cricket than test cricket. It's funny watching older test cricket clips, even into the early 90s, because of how quiet the crowd is compared to these days. I was watching the 1989 Ashes the other day, and the crowd was just dead silent until a boundary was hit or a wicket fell, in which case there was polite clapping.Matteh said:The fact they kept cheering even though England were getting pretty hammered is fairplay to them.
Funny you should say that, I find it's completely the opposite in England. There is generally more going on in the field at a faster pace in ODIs, so there is less banter, songs, chants etc from the crowd.FaaipDeOiad said:Yeah. I don't mind them or the noise, though I usually associate the songs and so on more with ODI cricket than test cricket. It's funny watching older test cricket clips, even into the early 90s, because of how quiet the crowd is compared to these days. I was watching the 1989 Ashes the other day, and the crowd was just dead silent until a boundary was hit or a wicket fell, in which case there was polite clapping.
ODIs from the 80s are the opposite though.
That may be the case now, but I don't think it used to be. If you watch older videos of cricket the crowd is always quieter and more dignified in test cricket, particularly in England, while ODI cricket is usually quite noisy. The exception to this is the West Indies, where the crowd always seems to have made a hell of a lot of noise.Jungle Jumbo said:Funny you should say that, I find it's completely the opposite in England. There is generally more going on in the field at a faster pace in ODIs, so there is less banter, songs, chants etc from the crowd.