Without getting into a great debate, name one better keeper at present.Dasa said:I don't want to get into a huge debate now, but I think Gilchrist has been a batsman who has benefited greatly from the decline in bowling standards and flat pitches, and there are much better 'keepers around. Add to that, in my all-time XI I'd have a couple of all-rounders in there, I don't see the rationale in picking Gilchrist.
I had trouble spitting it out, but what I meant to say is that a player can be great without being peerless. Ponting is a perfect example, he's a great batsman but he's not peerless in the way that Warne and McGrath are.Slats4ever said:sounds complicated ohtani... TBH i only think that there are about 10 players in the history of the game who should be caled great. The word great loses it's meaning if you start going for too many more.
Ok, in terms of pure 'keeping, I'd say Sanga is on par, Kamran Akmal superior, if Chris Read were selected (as he should be) - superior...on potential, Dinesh Karthik is on the way (just looks natural), same with Ramdin. McCullum I'm not sure about...but he certainly looks like he could become one of the best.social said:Without getting into a great debate, name one better keeper at present.
That's the point - no-one in history has come close to being as devastating with the bat whilst being a top keeper.Dasa said:None of them come close in batting terms, obviously
I'll second that, actually. One of the best overs I've ever seen - in fact probably the best that I can remember vividly.Pedro Delgado said:Has anyone hit the ball straight out of the 'Gabba before? That was some shot by Lee, and may warrant nomination per se. No Aussies or Englishmen going to second my choice of Fred's over?
Boooooooooooooooooooo.