capt_Luffy
International Coach
Most teams bar WI in the 80s were pure midthink that got refuted and axxed a while ago, that is given to 50s and current era now tho those are counted as bowling friendly too.
Most teams bar WI in the 80s were pure midthink that got refuted and axxed a while ago, that is given to 50s and current era now tho those are counted as bowling friendly too.
agree mostly, England post beefy decline/willis retirement was pretty mid, Australia did get good at end with Mcdermott/Hughes/Reid but their mid 80s attack is mid, India is India, Pakistan was good with Imran and then Wasim/Qadir in mid 80s, NZ was Hadlee + decent support bowlers so I guess only Pak, NZ and WI were decent while the big three were struggling.Most teams bar WI in the 80s were pure mid
Basically WI were arguably the best to ever exist, 2 teams were dragged around by two top 5 ATGs and rest were mid.agree mostly, England post beefy decline/willis retirement was pretty mid, Australia did get good at end with Mcdermott/Hughes/Reid but their mid 80s attack is mid, India is India, Pakistan was good with Imran and then Wasim/Qadir in mid 80s, NZ was Hadlee + decent support bowlers so I guess only Pak, NZ and WI were decent while the big three were struggling.
Yeah, also feel like most bowlers of the time were also kinda HTBsBasically WI were arguably the best to ever exist, 2 teams were dragged around by two top 5 ATGs and rest were mid.
Still are really. Probs even more. Look at Cummins, Rabada, Anderson, Ashwin, Jadeja, Hazlewood, Broad, Philander at home and compare with away. Heck even Roach, Holder, Woakes, Jayasuriya, and a plethora of mid Indian spinners and Saffa pacers have ATG numbers at home.Yeah, also feel like most bowlers of the time were also kinda HTBs
tbh Broad is more a condition bully than a home bully but yeah these days is actually worse, look at Roach's home numbers for an example, 196 @ 22.3 witb 46 SR.Still are really. Probs even more. Look at Cummins, Rabada, Ashwin, Jadeja, Hazlewood, Broad, Philander at home and compare with away. Heck even Roach, Holder, Woakes, Jayasuriya, and a plethora of mid Indian spinners and Saffa pacers have ATG numbers at home.
Well lemme look at this a bit more indepth.??
Not to forget, isn't the common belief floating around here that the 70s and 80s were among most bowling friendly eras?
without them2000s fans thanking Bangladesh and Zimbabwe right now
I mean, you can do that for many eras.without them
2000s: 33.66
expected
I'd do it if I had the energy, maybe laterI mean, you can do that for many eras.
Besides I’m actually getting 30.10, excluding runs made against them as well.I'd do it if I had the energy, maybe later
Awta. I'd add Donald as well and Walsh. Oh you said atg. Disregard Walsh. He's great though.McGrath, Hadlee, Ambrose, Warne, Bumrah, Wasim and ofc 4 horsemen of pacocalypse are probably the only ATG bowlers no one can label to have records tilted unconventionally home way even a bit post War.
Bumrah - 0 10’fers in 45 tests.With the exception of Marshall, most great fast bowlers have certain flaws in their record.
Hadlee - Medicore record against Pak. Avg of 28.3 in 12 Tests.
McGrath - Mediocre record against the best opponent he faced(SA). Lack of penetration in Asian pitches - Just 1 Fer in 17 Tests.
Ambrose - He did not play much in Asia. Just 6 Tests. Didn’t play in India. Avg 38 against India.
Steyn - Batting era or not, averaged 31 against England. Avg of 29 in Aus & 32 in England.
Donald - Mediocre against the best team of his era(Aus). Averaged just 28 in Australia.
Imran - Away record isn’t as impressive as home record. Avg of 28 in Aus and 28 in India.
Lillee - The most influential fast bowler played only 5 Tests outside Aus/England/NZ.
Garner - Played 50 out of 58 Tests in Aus/Eng/WI. Did not play in India. Played only 3 Tests in Asia.
Holding - Avg of 35 in NZ in 7 Tests.
And NZ.Bumrah - 0 10’fers in 45 tests.