• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Does world cricket need a strong England?

Does world cricket need a strong England?


  • Total voters
    31

govinda indian fan

International 12th Man
Imo after bgt Australia clear best team in world
1. Aus
2. India/eng
3.eng/ ind
4. Nz
5.sa
6.sl
7.8.9.wi/ pak/ ban
Wont rate sa as second best team just because they made it to wtc final. They had easiest fixtures and havent played aus or eng in this cycle
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
Imo after bgt Australia clear best team in world
1. Aus
2. India/eng
3.eng/ ind
4. Nz
5.sa
6.sl
7.8.9.wi/ pak/ ban
Wont rate sa as second best team just because they made it to wtc final. They had easiest fixtures and havent played aus or eng in this cycle
SA beat the Windies and Bangladesh away. I couldn't imagine England doing that.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
Let's wait till the WTC Final before dismissing SA completely. They might not be the 2nd best but what if they beat Aus in the final? And since Ind/Eng/NZ have been so inconsistent, I can't seem to put any of them as 2nd, at the moment.
 

Molehill

Cricketer Of The Year
Let's wait till the WTC Final before dismissing SA completely. They might not be the 2nd best but what if they beat Aus in the final? And since Ind/Eng/NZ have been so inconsistent, I can't seem to put any of them as 2nd, at the moment.
I could quite easily see SA winning this. If they get on the right side of a helpful toss, then there's no doubt they have the firepower in the bowling ranks to cause carnage to a suspect Aussie batting line up. But does that make them one of the top 2 teams? They've made the most of an easy qualification process, one that I suspect other teams would've qualified from too. It just highlights the flaws in the current system, but I hope they do win it to expose it.
 

Chin Music

State Vice-Captain
I could quite easily see SA winning this. If they get on the right side of a helpful toss, then there's no doubt they have the firepower in the bowling ranks to cause carnage to a suspect Aussie batting line up. But does that make them one of the top 2 teams? They've made the most of an easy qualification process, one that I suspect other teams would've qualified from too. It just highlights the flaws in the current system, but I hope they do win it to expose it.
Yeah, I do reckon that if they have a fully fit bowling lineup, they could easily castle Australia for not very many in England, given favourable conditions. Their batting seems to have improved a bit over a couple of years but looks a little flakey, especially in the top 3.
 

Silly Point 2.0

Cricket Spectator
I did fear for them around the time of the last England tour there but they seem to be back as a competitive Test outfit again. Still churning out fast bowlers as well.
 

govinda indian fan

International 12th Man
I could quite easily see SA winning this. If they get on the right side of a helpful toss, then there's no doubt they have the firepower in the bowling ranks to cause carnage to a suspect Aussie batting line up. But does that make them one of the top 2 teams? They've made the most of an easy qualification process, one that I suspect other teams would've qualified from too. It just highlights the flaws in the current system, but I hope they do win it to expose it.
Agree but they need absolute bowling friendly conditions when they bowl and better batting conditions when they bat. Their batting equally shaky maybe more so then Aussies and could see them struggle vs Cummins strac and hazlewood
 

Immenso

International Vice-Captain
I think South Africa are going to be 'the team of the next few years' once Australia's old players fade out. Reckon they're about to have another moment in the sun.

The e.g. Michael Vaughan rent-a-mouth comments will sound stupid(er) in a year or so's hindsight IMO.

But. I may be over-rating their batting, though. I've I only seen them in highlights packages this summer, not watching live ...
Maybe their upcoming batters this summer were all modern vibes batters (rather than technicians) having good days at the same time?
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Let's wait till the WTC Final before dismissing SA completely. They might not be the 2nd best but what if they beat Aus in the final? And since Ind/Eng/NZ have been so inconsistent, I can't seem to put any of them as 2nd, at the moment.
SA have every chance, especially in a 1 off Test. I'd have them about 45/55
 

Ali TT

International Vice-Captain
I think South Africa are going to be 'the team of the next few years' once Australia's old players fade out. Reckon they're about to have another moment in the sun.

The e.g. Michael Vaughan rent-a-mouth comments will sound stupid(er) in a year or so's hindsight IMO.

But. I may be over-rating their batting, though. I've I only seen them in highlights packages this summer, not watching live ...
Maybe their upcoming batters this summer were all modern vibes batters (rather than technicians) having good days at the same time?
I think equally they could also have a run of series defeats. However, if they can keep all the quicks fit they'll remain strong at home and have enough spinners to give them a chance in Asia. Their run of series over 25-27 will be a good test of where they are, although sadly only 2 tests in India.
 

Top