Yeah we can't use aggression as a factor to differentiate between Viv and Lara.Viv for me is ahead of Lara.
However Lara too could up the rate and play attacking shots, step up a gear if the situation demanded it.
Only you would complain about bringing up a player in a thread dedicated to him.Not remotely part of that conversation. It wasn't applicable, necessary nor required.
I mentioned the 3 names I wanted to mention, you just can't help yourself.
As usual you lack awareness and context, so it's fine.Only you would complain about bringing up a player in a thread dedicated to him.
I didn't, I merely stated Lara too can step up a gear if he wanted.Yeah we can't use aggression as a factor to differentiate between Viv and Lara.
I agreed with you, to clarify.I didn't, I merely stated Lara too can step up a gear if he wanted.
Brian Lara has scored centuries only against McGrath & Pollock. I know he is a “genius” and best “on his day” batsman but this is truly shocking.Lara played 16 tests against Wasim, Waqar and Donald and never scored a century against them.
I don't think scoring centuries is be all and end all really. Viv didn't score a single century in his ATG 1981 tour of Australia vs Lillee, Thomson, Dymock and Hogg.Brian Lara has scored centuries only against McGrath & Pollock. I know he is a “genius” and best “on his day” batsman but this is truly shocking.
On the other hand his great rival Sachin Tendulkar has scored centuries against Akram, Waqar, McGrath, Donald, Pollock, Steyn, Walsh and Shoaib.
You mean 79/80 and yes he did.I don't think scoring centuries is be all and end all really. Viv didn't score a single century in his ATG 1981 tour of Australia vs Lillee, Thomson, Dymock and Hogg.
Oh yeah, 81 was Pakistan and had a century in the 1st Test. Well, my point stands as his innings read 140, 96, 76 and 74You mean 79/80 and yes he did.
You are right, it does totally defeat the argument of Lara being the best 'on his day' player if he is incapable of long innings against top quality pace. He may be literally the last bat you would pick to chase 300 against Lillee and Imran.Brian Lara has scored centuries only against McGrath & Pollock. I know he is a “genius” and best “on his day” batsman but this is truly shocking.
On the other hand his great rival Sachin Tendulkar has scored centuries against Akram, Waqar, McGrath, Donald, Pollock, Steyn, Walsh and Shoaib.
True, Hutton also only scored one ton in 1950-51 series against Lindwall/Miller/Johnston/Johnson in a series about as bowler friendly as 2018 Ind vs SA, didn't mean it was not an ATG tour thoI don't think scoring centuries is be all and end all really. Viv didn't score a single century in his ATG 1981 tour of Australia vs Lillee, Thomson, Dymock and Hogg.
Um no you lost your point because Viv still scored tons against top pacers in their prime in those series. He also scored a ton against Lillee and Thommo in 76.Oh yeah, 81 was Pakistan and had a century in the 1st Test. Well, my point stands as his innings read 140, 96, 76 and 74
One ton. In his ATG series....... Like Virat in 2018 SAUm no you lost your point because Viv still scored tons against top pacers in their prime in those series. He also scored a ton against Lillee and Thommo in 76.
One ton and no failures and scoring at a high SR. So yeah. Virat averaged 47 in SA what are you on about?One ton. In his ATG series....... Like Virat in 2018 SA
You are right, it does totally defeat the argument of Lara being the best 'on his day' player if he is incapable of long innings against top quality pace.
That's why they are top pacers.I was just going through the stats of all time great batsman and didn’t know scoring tons against top pacers was this difficult.