Prince EWS
Global Moderator
If not then maybe he should be.Reckon so
If not then maybe he should be.Reckon so
Could say the same about a lot of players, like most of themSmith's final average will not be an indicator of how utterly dominant he was at his peak. He literally had multiple years in a row averaging between 70 and 110.
Head is also one of the more technically correct batsmen in this seriesHead also with the best strike rate of the series. Two are related I think with these bowling lineups and pitches.
It's been a weak era in Australian cricket currently and past 10 to 15 years. The depth hasn't been strong like it used to be.its pretty average. he has peaked his career - several years ago. if he fails in SL then hes under pressure to get picked for the Ashes. He doesnt play spin well at all nowadays. issue is there is no one in the Shield cricket banging down the door to replace these guys, Aus bound to fall down the rankings with Eng and SAF likely to the top of the rankings in the next several years - SAF have some youngsters coming up and Eng as well(e.g. Brook who averages 58 in tests). Aus have pretty much no one coming up- Konstas is a T20 kid trying to play tests , dont see him with more than a 30 average in his career!
Re here, its game on 91 runs is quite a lot on this track, 7 wickets but a lot of tail enders/lower order players.
Recovering with a 4-5 over spell in the netsWhat's officially going on with Bumrah?
@silentstrikerRecovering with a 4-5 over spell in the nets
"Technically correct" is not how I would describe Travis HeadHead is also one of the more technically correct batsmen in this series
I enjoyed how @PlayerComparisons liked this because you were comparing two players.
Recovering with a 4-5 over spell in the nets
I reckon they knew it yesterday but didn't want to give Australia a lift by officially announcing he won't be there.Injured.
It’s all relative"Technically correct" is not how I would describe Travis Head
Haha I totally disagree with this tbh - he's underperformed his potential if anything, with how he was rated coming in he really should have gotten >20 Test hundreds over 100 TestsI always thought Khawaja was 1 or 2 bad series away from getting the chop when he came back in 2017 but some how he's managed to actually become a mainstay of the team - way overperformed his potential IMO
A weak era by comparison to an era with Hayden, Ponting, Waugh, Gilchrist, Warne and McGrath perhaps. We still have a win/loss ratio of over 1.7 since 2010.It's been a weak era in Australian cricket currently and past 10 to 15 years. The depth hasn't been strong like it used to be.
Yeah no Head still doesn't stand out as technically correct relative to those three.It’s all relative
Nobody should coach anyone to bat like current Uzi, Marnus or Smith
Don't even bother tbh, he makes the same post once a day every summer and won't entertain arguments otherwise.A weak era by comparison to an era with Hayden, Ponting, Waugh, Gilchrist, Warne and McGrath perhaps. We still have a win/loss ratio of over 1.7 since 2010.
he's only 77 tests in though and definitely on course for that if he plays a while longerHaha I totally disagree with this tbh - he's underperformed his potential if anything, with how he was rated coming in he really should have gotten >20 Test hundreds over 100 Tests