• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** 4th Test at Melbourne, 26-30 Dec 2024

devisreeprasadmahesh

Cricket Spectator
Gill has been a justified selection for most series he’s played. Arguably could have been dropped after the SA tour (or if you’re harsh after his first England tour) but he came back ok iirc and was doing well this year until this tour.

His rope is definitely reaching its end now but imo once Rohit and Kohli go there will be room for him again.

In ODIs he’s actually good so don’t get the complaint there.
Fair. But he is an average stop gap player with no hunger. His body language in the field is not inspiring. Never ever delivers in pressure situations and big matches. He crumbles and crumbles under pressure. Mentally unfit cricketer. Not someone for investing. Professional Cricket needs to be the game of fighters. Not free travellers
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
What's going on with this then? Apparently Aussie media was invited to a press conference but Jadeja didn't answer any questions in English?

"The tension between Indian Cricketers and Australian journalists are on the rise again after a strange and frosty media conference at the MCG on Saturday.

India’s Ravindra Jadeja faced reporters but the Australian media were bemused and confused when the star allrounder refused to answer questions in English"
Always just the worst guests in every country they tour. Rude and entitled.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Bro you lot just scapegoated your young debutant so the seniors could deflect the blame.
Indian cricket spent a decade telling us the lazy eyed accountant is an ATG then they shafted him mid tour. If you’re going to screw someone over, it should always be the b00b. Like neophyte CW posters, it’s what they’re there for.
 

the big bambino

Cricketer Of The Year
The intent memeing logic is dumb and the decision sucks, but in terms of actual impact it’s a low risk gamble imo, in the sense that the up and downsides are not really that far apart. It’s not like Konstas is a crap cricketer or Sweeney was blowing everyone away.
They should've played both.
 

TimAngas

State Vice-Captain
Not totally sold on dropping McSweeney but the kind of tepid footwork the top three have shown this series against Bumrah have yielded a net total of SFA runs so if someone has the gonads and maybe naivety to get out and play some front foot shots against him we may as well see if it yields any results. I also kind of get the logic about keeping a left hander there too. Khawaja's pull also just gives him one extra shot that has made him look more likely than the other two in the top three this series.
 

Blenkinsop

U19 Captain
Also when people disregard bowlers as being too slow to do well in Test cricket in Australia they seem to forget that Stuart Clark was quite handy.
 

SteveNZ

Cricketer Of The Year
The most outrageous thing about Bumrah's 2024 is the only time he couldn't take wickets was against NZ, who were in the midst of their statistically worst opening stands in 16 years, and had Devon Conway who looks like he's batting with a popsicle stick in roller skates
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
The most outrageous thing about Bumrah's 2024 is the only time he couldn't take wickets was against NZ, who were in the midst of their statistically worst opening stands in 16 years, and had Devon Conway who looks like he's batting with a popsicle stick in roller skates
They had an outrageous amount of luck during his spells tbf, esp. Conway.
 

SteveNZ

Cricketer Of The Year
They had an outrageous amount of luck during his spells tbf, esp. Conway.
Very true, although I remember him not coming around to either of the LHers initially which felt like a mistake.

I just don't see what will slow Bumrah down other than his body. He's a freak. Sending anyone into battle with him, let alone a teenager, seems like mutiny. The best you can hope for right now is get fortunate like us, or injury, or you at least try to blunt his new ball impact which McSweeney actually didn't do a bad job of. If Smith and Head can bat clear of him with lacquer on the ball, it's a win
 

GotSpin

Hall of Fame Member
Not totally sold on dropping McSweeney but the kind of tepid footwork the top three have shown this series against Bumrah have yielded a net total of SFA runs so if someone has the gonads and maybe naivety to get out and play some front foot shots against him we may as well see if it yields any results. I also kind of get the logic about keeping a left hander there too. Khawaja's pull also just gives him one extra shot that has made him look more likely than the other two in the top three this series.
That’s all well and good but the more outrageous move is keeping Marsh
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
Very true, although I remember him not coming around to either of the LHers initially which felt like a mistake.

I just don't see what will slow Bumrah down other than his body. He's a freak. Sending anyone into battle with him, let alone a teenager, seems like mutiny. The best you can hope for right now is get fortunate like us, or injury, or you at least try to blunt his new ball impact which McSweeney actually didn't do a bad job of. If Smith and Head can bat clear of him with lacquer on the ball, it's a win
Yeah Bumrah made the mistake of not going around the wicket to the NZ openers. He and even Siraj persisted over the wicket for too long.

Regarding the dropping of McSweeney, I think it's a mistake on two counts. One he is a youngster who is developing and has batted as well as the other top order batters in the side. Secondly he was only getting out in the 2nd spell of Bumrah and was leaving well on length and doing a good job of getting the ball old for the likes of Head. If Head had to come in early, I don't think he would've played this well. So you can attribute some of his runs down to balls faced by the top order.

Sam Konstas may whack a few but I am sure he will fare worse than McSweeney in terms of balls faced. Extra 10-20 runs won't matter if Konstas gets out in the 7th over compared to McSweeney in the 15th or 20th over.

25 (25) vs 12 (55)
 
Last edited:

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
It's just unnecessary change mid series. Konstas hasn't seen Bumrah or Indian attack in full flow, unlike McSweeney. It's a gamble. May take him a test or two to get used to the attack and playing test cricket. Now wasn't the time at 1-1 in the series. McSweeney's been made scapegoat for the failures of all around him (Marsh should have been first on the list). Selectors are making the change just to show they are 'doing something'/ taking action. I feel bad for him as he was interviewed on Thursday saying that he was excited to realise his childhood dream of playing the Boxing Day Test. And next day he was dropped.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
If it had rained a little more on day 5 at the Gabba and McSweeney not batted, he would still be playing. So whats actually the tilted the scales against him is his last and most irrelevant innings where he faced 25 balls and was unlucky to get out cutting to Akash.
 

Top