Are you ****ing kidding me?
Starc is a very good bowler, but Akram is rated the best by basically all the great 90s players, from every country. The things he could do consistently, only Marshall had that level of skill
Starc isn't even the most skilled or dangerous of his era
Akram is one of the best bowlers ever in tests. Probably #2 to Marshall. #3 - #4- probably Ambrose & Mcgrath. Ambrose completely unplayable. Mcgrath great but had incredible support from Warne and other pacers.
Akram swing the ball both ways, seam it both ways, really incredible level of skill, that kind of skill not many bowlers had.
Based on mainly figures ,not primarily longevity.
Fast bowlers only
#1 Marshall
#2 Akram
#3 Ambrose
#4 Mcgrath
#3 and #4 are close. Marshall is easily the best followed by Akram. No bowlers of this calibre exist in cricket currently.
Just all bowlers incl spinners. Warne the best bowler ever- 708 wickets! We just know how good he was, because wrist spin is pretty much dead now, and that kind of bowling is once in a 100 years. Just wasnt great in India(it was favourable for over spinners like Kumble and off spin like Harbhajan, not so much wrist spin during his time) but other subcontinent places like SL he was good.
Murali probably #6, he feasted on a lot of BANG and ZIM though which padded his figures and wasnt good in Australia but hes still at #6, got 800 test wickets at an incredible average(again the BANG and ZIM clarification and not great in places like Australia bring him down to #6).
#1 Warne
#2 Marshall
#3 Akram
#4 Ambrose
#5 Mcgrath
#6 Murali