DrWolverine
State 12th Man
Fair enoughReason I said it was weird to call it a peak.
Fair enoughReason I said it was weird to call it a peak.
1. Donald BradmanWho is your number 2?
A complete recordWrong. It's an average of 56 without Zim and Bang from Jan 1993 to Jan 2011.
Home avg 54.24
Away avg 57.79
View attachment 43184
Link here
Eh probably enough derailment of this thread for now, but the bullet points - I don’t rate a higher SR, I don’t rate peer review, especially from more modern times, I don’t care about his swag. Peak was obviously magnificent but after that not so much.@Coronis May I know why you placed Viv behind Kallis, Chappell, Barrington and Sanga?
I was talking about career averages which I said directly literally a little later.Wrong. It's an average of 56 without Zim and Bang from Jan 1993 to Jan 2011.
Home avg 54.24
Away avg 57.79
View attachment 43184
Link here
92 to 2011 is not a peak.I do find it a bit weird to say Sachin had a peak of 92-11 considering he had that whole slump for multiple years in the middle of that.
It would be like if Kohli suddenly went on a huge tear for 5 years and people started calling his peak from 2015 onwards.
Ind, Pak & NZ were the minnows back then.Sachin's average is definitely inflated a bit by this when compared to guys like Sobers/Viv who didn't get any minnows.
What a party pooper.Eh probably enough derailment of this thread for now, but the bullet points - I don’t rate a higher SR, I don’t rate peer review, especially from more modern times, I don’t care about his swag. Peak was obviously magnificent but after that not so much.
I'm gonna assume you aren't talking about Viv because ****ing Hadlee, Pakistan had a monsterous attack and India was often winning too.Ind, Pak & NZ were the minnows back then.
The reason Tendulkar doesn't have as great a peak as others is primarily because India was not playing that many tests during his peak years. And the test series that they did play were often 2 matches and sometimes 3 matches in his absolute peak. So Tendulkar didn't get complete opportunity to run home the advantage after scoring 1-2 tons in the short series. If some of those series were 4 matches or 5 matches, he'd have undoubtedly got huge runs and 3 or more tons in few of those series in his absolute peak. India's prime focus back then was on ODI cricket.How is Viv the greatest peak ever? Smith had a better peak than him and Sachin had an equally great peak as well.
He still is north of 50 and he averages 40 plus everywhere over 20 years, so it's not like minnows propped his rep.Sachin's average is definitely inflated a bit by this when compared to guys like Sobers/Viv who didn't get any minnows.
So for Sobers those teams were comparable to modern WIs. Very weak sides and we kinda treat then as semi-minnows for those who line their pockets against them.I'm gonna assume you aren't talking about Viv because ****ing Hadlee, Pakistan had a monsterous attack and India was often winning too.
For Sobers, No.
Team records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPNcricinfo.com
stats.espncricinfo.com
the statistical gap between him and Viv seems to cease on minnow bashing being removed and Sobers seem to get the statistical edge, just found it interesting.He still is north of 50 and he averages 40 plus everywhere over 20 years, so it's not like minnows propped his rep.
Lara did it too. As did Dravid, Kallis, Gavaskar I think.Almost more impressive imo to have a second peak. Intuitively feels that much harder to return to that similar level of play after an extended period of downtime.
What do you think Viv was doing from '77 to '79?If longevity is really important, Viv Richards isn’t comparable to Sachin Tendulkar. His record is similar to Ken Barrington(1959-1968).
Viv’s peak was between 1976-1988 and he barely played Test cricket in 1977, 1978 and 1979.
Viv : 92 Tests. 7091 runs. Avg of 55.40. 22 tons.
Ken : 82 Tests. 6806 runs. Avg of 58.6. 20 tons.
Sachin’s peak is unparalleled
1992-2011 :
172 Tests. 14622 runs. Avg of 57.57. 50 tons.
Nah, more soSo for Sobers those teams were comparable to modern WIs. Very weak sides and we kinda treat then as semi-minnows for those who line their pockets against them.
Sobers probably faced as many weaker teams tho non-minnows generally as a percentage of his career.the statistical gap between him and Viv seems to cease on minnow bashing being removed and Sobers seem to get the statistical edge, just found it interesting.
Prime years.I would not call it a peak but more of a sustained brilliance.
WSC doesn’t really count imoWhat do you think Viv was doing from '77 to '79?