So true!Historically India has done well against the tier 1 bowler and failed against the understudies. We are finished
Nah this anomaly of a phenomenon is due to stop next test. It can't keep happening!So true!
As far as I can tell, of that list only Steketee, O'Neill and Paris aren't either injured or still being heavily workload managed (and with the way Steketee has bowled this season, he's frankly lucky Queensland haven't given him a spell). So Abbott's selection, while not the way I would have gone myself, isn't as unreasonable as people are saying imo. Paris is definitely seriously stiff though.Bowlers not in the squad who are better than Abbott and Doggett:
Tremain, Bartlett, Sketetee, McAndrew, Johnson, O'Neill, Sutherland, Paris, Richardson, Morris. Might be forgetting some more too.
Admittedly some of those are injured, but still....
I think this is reflective of the collective delusion of punters and not the reality that one team just smacked the other by about 400 runs (and a declaration).Current odds. They sound about right.
View attachment 42840
Australia clear favorites but not overwhelmingly so by any means. India with a very good chance.
You could make a lot of money if you wanted if that were true.I think this is reflective of the collective delusion of punters and not the reality that one team just smacked the other by about 400 runs (and a declaration).
2016 vs SA.It makes sense to me. Australia have been dominant in pink ball Tests. Shami is still not available. Australia still have a fantastic all around attack. And they are exceptionally difficult to beat at home, especially twice in a row. Last time they lost two in a row was in 2011 Ashes?
Jasprit BumrahAre there many bowlers with a better record than Paris to have not played a Test for Australia?
Hmm. I think as fans we tend to underrate our side's chances. Perhaps neutrals are best to decide the merits of both sides. Look, I hope you're right. To the point I don't want to blow my money. (sheepish grin).You could make a lot of money if you wanted if that were true.
It makes sense to me. Australia have been dominant in pink ball Tests. Shami is still not available. Australia still have a fantastic all around attack. And they are exceptionally difficult to beat at home, especially twice in a row. Last time they lost two in a row was in 2011 Ashes?
On the other hand, it's closer than it would have been prior to last week because the Indian batting lineup showed some semblance of form when they had been out of it, and Bumrah is making a case to be on the short list of the greatest fast bowlers of all time. So I think it's fair.
Australia favorites but India certainly in with a big chance.
Hmm. I think as fans we tend to underrate our side's chances. Perhaps neutrals are best to decide the merits of both sides. Look, I hope you're right. To the point I don't want to blow my money. (sheepish grin).
Case in pointOur batting line up still sucks and our bowling outside of Bumrah is non-existent. Aus very clear favorites IMO. They are gonna hit back hard and we are gonna take a hiding in the next test.
This warmup match is proof that it's literally Bumrah or bust. Most probably Australia will win the pink match comfortably. I don't see India even making it close unless they play proper 5 bowlers (including 1-2 who can bat) rather than trundlers like Reddy. Just for the sake for pace options you can't play crap bowlers like him. Jadeja and Ashwin are far far superior options.Our batting line up still sucks and our bowling outside of Bumrah is non-existent. Aus very clear favorites IMO. They are gonna hit back hard and we are gonna take a hiding in the next test.
Ashwin won't be picked, again.boland is a hazlewood clone shut up
Yeah we're just gonna get Boland for Haze this time which is all well and good but if we get more soreness or injuries etc we could totally end up with one of those guys playing, which is very silly.It worries me that I'd guess this current test squad with Doggett and Abbott in it will be both for Adelaide and Brisbane. Our selectors love sticking with silly ideas so we might go into one of these tests with a third seamer who isn't remotely test class.