govinda indian fan
State Vice-Captain
Akash as batting is at similar leval and akash is better in moving the ballrana bowls wobble balls
akash moves the ball conventionally
wonder which option is more suitable for the pink ball
Akash as batting is at similar leval and akash is better in moving the ballrana bowls wobble balls
akash moves the ball conventionally
wonder which option is more suitable for the pink ball
They will go with your lineup IMO.Gill won't be ready, and Shami will not be flown in either.
So:
- Rahul
- Jaiswal
- Rohit
- Kohli
- Jurel
- Pant
- Jadeja
- Reddy
- Deep
- Bumrah
- Siraj
I still don't love the bowling attack outside of Bumrah, but India does need to bolster its batting since that is its weaker suit. I would consider Akash Deep instead of Rana or Reddy. I would slot him in ahead of Rana if you wanted more batting and instead of Reddy if you wanted more bowling.
I do hope Shami can come back - though I don't know if they will actually fly him in.
One thing is I hope Sarfaraz bats in the PM XI game and makes runs because I think it's a shame that he isn't getting a chance.
Think will take a decision after the pink ball simulation.Yeah Akash Deep can be devastating with the pink ball. Guy bowls hard lengths and nips it just enough off the seam to keep all modes of dismissals in play. Great round the wicket too, as they all seem to be these days.
This Indian side is actually better than the one that played at Gabba.They will go with your lineup IMO.
Rohit
Jaiswal
Rahul
Kohli
Pant
Jurel
Jadeja
Reddy / (Ashwin)
Akash Deep
Bumrah
Siraj
But India will lose badly so it doesn't matter, as ******* deadweight Rohit is back as captain And Australia will not lose 2 games on the trot to this India side at home especially not with a pink ball. Australia is 75-25 favs for this match IMHO.
That series does have a bearing. It has made India 'more' desperate and driven for success. Just like Australia will be 2nd Test onwards.This Indian side is actually better than the one that played at Gabba.
The NZ series has no bearing on this. That series amplified India's weaknesses.
That is just mumbo jumbo.That series does have a bearing. It has made India 'more' desperate and driven for success. Just like Australia will be 2nd Test onwards.
The facts about Marnus being the luckiest batsman ever. Laid out here,
Marnus was so lucky when we went there on last tour that he got dropped four five times.remember one off saini at gabba poor lad couldn't play another test for indiaThe facts about Marnus being the luckiest batsman ever. Laid out here,
Please talk more about Root in this thread@mackembhoy saw a tweet from indian fan reacting to Lehman comment that root isn't great till he scores century in Australia saying ponting averaged 26 with 0 hundreds in india till his 14th test( ironically root has played 14 tests in aus) if punter can be atg why cant root be. Imo Joe is atg and doesn't need to prove his greatnees to every tom dick and harry. hope he gets big double hundred in Australia next year and shuts up all haters
I hope he gets hit in the nuts 6 more times.@mackembhoy saw a tweet from indian fan reacting to Lehman comment that root isn't great till he scores century in Australia saying ponting averaged 26 with 0 hundreds in india till his 14th test( ironically root has played 14 tests in aus) if punter can be atg why cant root be. Imo Joe is atg and doesn't need to prove his greatnees to every tom dick and harry. hope he gets big double hundred in Australia next year and shuts up all haters
Interesting stat, it highlights how Australia hardly ever lose the series opener. But when they do, it's tough coming back from it as it means opposition is well adjusted to the conditions having won at places like Gabba or Perth. Having said that, it's a good opportunity for Australia to rectify this statistic. As is often the case with stats like this 'so and so has not won/lost for x number of years and next thing you know they end up overcoming that'. Good omen for Australia.0 Test series won by Australia at home since 1970 after losing the series opener. They have lost the first Test of a home series nine times since 1970, and have gone on to lose the series eight times.
He literally believes in the Monte Carlo fallacy so it's entirely on brand for him to think someone mentioning that statistic cosmically increases Australia's chances.That's not what an omen is.
Australia is due. They can't always lose at home after losing the 1st test.That's not what an omen is.