• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Where will Steve Smith end up being ranked?

govinda indian fan

State Vice-Captain
For me smith would end up as good as lara tendulkar and ponting. Personally i have started watching cricket since 2007 never saw lara or ponting at his peak saw sachin at his second peak from 07-11. For me smith alongside sachin are best i have seen
 

Coronis

International Coach
Nobody says bumrah is better then botham. Bumarh is fast bowler while sir ian was all rounder cant compere Apple with oranges and yes botham is atg and second greatest all rounder after gary sobers. It is universally agreed
Tell that to the 100 recent meaningless batsman vs bowler threads
 

Pap Finn Keighl

International Debutant
Here's an example. People are fanboying over how much of an ATG Bumrah already is.

Bumrah has 41 Tests, 181 wkts @ 20.06, 11 5fers, 0 10fers

Botham at 41 Tests, 202 wkts @ 21.20, 17 5fers and 4 10fers. He also had 1977 runs @ 32.40 with 8 centuries

You tell me who should be considered greater?
After 41 tests Botham was challenging Sobers and Bradman not Bumrah.
 

kyear2

International Coach
Ponting only topped 60 average in one innings from memory but definitely Ponting and Viv were thought of as brutal high 50's batting gods for most of their career, nothing like their low 50's averages they ended up with because of age

At 35 it's all down hill for Smith from here. Even now at the same number of innings Smith averages 56.40 whereas Ponting was averaging 58.72
Correct, yet Punter is dismissed by a some on the forum.
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
Why not? Smith is the top bat of his era and doesn't have the weaknesses that Lara has but does have his strength in terms of ATG series.
Smith does have an obvious weakness. He covers his stumps and makes himself a LBW candidate. His super reflexes used to bail him out.

On pitches that seam, it's not a good technique at all. Plus Australian pitches didn't use to seam in his prime 2014-19. Similar situation to Ponting in his prime 2001-07. If pitches had been more balanced between 2014-19, Smith's average would be low 50s easily right now and falling. It's not a surprise that his record in SA (where the ball seams) is middling. And he hasn't played there since 2018 either or else it'd look worse.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
It’s funny how a couple of bad years and Smith is no longer being rated alongside Tendulkar and Lara and instead being shoved below Ponting, Waugh, Chappell etc.
That is an over correction too. I stand by what I said about him when he was at his best.

I didn't see him overtaking Lara and Sachin then, I do not see it now. But he is definitely in that tier below Bradman where all these batters stand.
 

HeathDavisSpeed

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
That is an over correction too. I stand by what I said about him when he was at his best.

I didn't see him overtaking Lara and Sachin then, I do not see it now. But he is definitely in that tier below Bradman where all these batters stand.
I suspect he'll suffer in the long run from simply not being as aesthetically pleasing a batsman as your Laras and Tendulkars. In terms of effectiveness, it shouldn't matter but we know that they do.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I suspect he'll suffer in the long run from simply not being as aesthetically pleasing a batsman as your Laras and Tendulkars. In terms of effectiveness, it shouldn't matter but we know that they do.
Possibly but I think Lara and Sachin were just better batsmen in terms of quality. Aesthetics has nothing to do with it. And I kinda enjoy watching the quirky technique and mid match changes that Smith does to his batting. Actually, I think those are what makes me rate him in the genius tier, not his runs.
 
Last edited:

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
I suspect he'll suffer in the long run from simply not being as aesthetically pleasing a batsman as your Laras and Tendulkars. In terms of effectiveness, it shouldn't matter but we know that they do.
I think that's the real reason. If he was aesthetically pleasing, he would have had his position locked.

Otherwise I don't see a reason for him to be below Lara.

Tendulkar yes given his longevity.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Smith does have an obvious weakness. He covers his stumps and makes himself a LBW candidate. His super reflexes used to bail him out.

On pitches that seam, it's not a good technique at all. Plus Australian pitches didn't use to seam in his prime 2014-19. Similar situation to Ponting in his prime 2001-07. If pitches had been more balanced between 2014-19, Smith's average would be low 50s easily right now and falling. It's not a surprise that his record in SA (where the ball seams) is middling. And he hasn't played there since 2018 either or else it'd look worse.
I myself have pointed out that issue. But I think his problems with seam now are also coinciding with a.genuine decline.
 

GotSpin

Hall of Fame Member
Ponting only topped 60 average in one innings from memory but definitely Ponting and Viv were thought of as brutal high 50's batting gods for most of their career, nothing like their low 50's averages they ended up with because of age

At 35 it's all down hill for Smith from here. Even now at the same number of innings Smith averages 56.40 whereas Ponting was averaging 58.72
It’s interesting how Ponting completely dominated shield cricket still as well. Don’t think Smith could do the same
 

Top