• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** 1st Test @ Perth, 22nd-26th November

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
I think India have got their lengths quite wrong today. Had they bowled these lengths yesterday they would be in big trouble in this game.
Yeah Rana esp. has gotten carried away with all the bounce. TBF, a common rookie mistake when playing in Aus but really, worst possible time for us when he lost his head a bit.
 

Nintendo

Cricketer Of The Year
Batting does look much easier right now. No idea if that's just reddies bowling, but starc hasn't been beaten in a while.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
You people are waxing lyrical about Pujara as if Labuschagne didn't just take a steaming dump while trying to stonewall and Pant hasn't been the best batter by far in this test.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Yeah Rana esp. has gotten carried away with all the bounce. TBF, a common rookie mistake when playing in Aus but really, worst possible time for us when he lost his head a bit.
Worst possible time would have been at 5pm yesterday when Head was still in tbf. These two are going at 1.5rpo, it's annoying but not a problem yet
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
You people are waxing lyrical about Pujara as if Labuschagne didn't just take a steaming dump while trying to stonewall and Pant hasn't been the best batter by far in this test.
I dont think Pujara today will survive ten balls on this track. Guy could not handle gentle 130 kph swing from a TN left armer in the Ranji not long ago. What I meant is the attitude to survive and get your eye in. Pujara at his best, famously accelerates brilliantly past 30 or 40 runs in his innings and esp. after 50 and then after 100. THAT would be goldust here.
 

Nintendo

Cricketer Of The Year
The same as yesterday when the ball gets a little older and the openers are off
You reckon? I feel like the Aussie pacers where still regularly beating the bat in that period. Cummins was just loose and gave india enough overpitched balls to tick the score over.
 

SteveNZ

Cricketer Of The Year
You people are waxing lyrical about Pujara as if Labuschagne didn't just take a steaming dump while trying to stonewall and Pant hasn't been the best batter by far in this test.
That's not what people are saying. They're saying it's still an asset to have a rock solid crease occupier at 3. They didn't say a mentally shot 3 who can't lay bat on it. And you can still have your Pant type player at 5-6, in fact every team benefits from that
 

Arachnödouche2.0

Cricket Spectator
I dont think Pujara today will survive ten balls on this track. Guy could not handle gentle 130 kph swing from a TN left armer in the Ranji not long ago. What I meant is the attitude to survive and get your eye in. Pujara at his best, famously accelerates brilliantly past 30 or 40 runs in his innings and esp. after 50 and then after 100. THAT would be goldust here.
Yeah, Pujara's best innings developed in a steady if almost imperceptible upwards gradient. Labuschagne was plain stuck.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
I dont think Pujara today will survive ten balls on this track. Guy could not handle gentle 130 kph swing from a TN left armer in the Ranji not long ago. What I meant is the attitude to survive and get your eye in. Pujara at his best, famously accelerates brilliantly past 30 or 40 runs in his innings and esp. after 50 and then after 100. THAT would be goldust here.
Pujara would also have been happy to just wear balls on the hip/stomach/chest/wherever rather than be drawn into playing at lengths he shouldn't play.
 

King Kane

International Regular
Disappointing that India couldn't bowl Australia out for under 100, even more disappointing is that Hayden is back commentating. again on Ch7.

Him waffling on is making me considering a switch to the Fox coverage but then I will have to listen to Warner waffling on who is almost as bad.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
This is very strange cricket. Starc clearly not interested in doing anything but blocking and taking a late single and Bumrah just... allowing this. Dunno if either decision is the right one on both ends
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Yeah, not great from Bumrah. Not proactive, not even reactive, just letting it drift
Well honestly it might simply be a calculation that Starc will eventually get bored, try to hit a boundary, and make an error, rather than being satisfied with 1rpo (which doesn't really hurt India at all). He might be right!

Though I can't imagine he would have been expecting to bowl again today.
 

Top