• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Sehwag vs Jadeja

Better test cricketer?


  • Total voters
    26

ma1978

International Debutant
Lol is thinking bowling doesn't matter. Or that Jadeja didn't win matches. That requires a certain level of, shall we say, "imagination".
Jadeja is a second strong bowler. Ashwin wins matches. Jadeja is support.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
Jadeja is a second strong bowler. Ashwin wins matches. Jadeja is support.
That's disingenuous. Jadeja has won India plenty of matches. He averages 20 with the ball and has a WPM of 5...... It's like saying Sehwag was a second (or third) strong batsman and it was Sachin who won India matches....
 

Coronis

International Coach
I mean, if the Kiwibros can have Jack Cowie; why can't we have Amar Singh with even poorer pace prospects??
Well Amar Singh has no great record himself. His record is comparable at best to the other pace talent India has. Bumrah aside.
 

ma1978

International Debutant
That's disingenuous. Jadeja has won India plenty of matches. He averages 20 with the ball and has a WPM of 5...... It's like saying Sehwag was a second (or third) strong batsman and it was Sachin who won India matches....
I think this is one where the numbers favour the man, it’s very clear that Ashwin is the lead bowler and Jadeja is support. If Ashwin wasn’t playing for India in an area where spin matters Jadeja couldn’t lead. And when Jadeja plays ex Ashwin he is used as a part time bowler
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
I think this is one where the numbers favour the man, it’s very clear that Ashwin is the lead bowler and Jadeja is support. If Ashwin wasn’t playing for India in an area where spin matters Jadeja couldn’t lead. And when Jadeja plays ex Ashwin he is used as a part time bowler
Again, calling a bowler who takes 5 wickets a match "part time" is too much..... So, Garner was part time? And so was Pollock?? What about Warny???
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
Well Amar Singh has no great record himself. His record is comparable at best to the other pace talent India has. Bumrah aside.
As I said, similar situation to Cowie really (unless you want to define his 7 Test match career great). We generally lack good pacers and Amar Singh had the best peer review by far. Since then, we have seen pacers with better record but bar Bumrah (and arguably Shami and Zaheer for parts, though I think it's pushing a bit, not counting Kapil) none has comparable peer ratings. And he could bat to boot (India's first Test half centurion).
 

Coronis

International Coach
As I said, similar situation to Cowie really (unless you want to define his 7 Test match career great). We generally lack good pacers and Amar Singh had the best peer review by far. Since then, we have seen pacers with better record but bar Bumrah (and arguably Shami and Zaheer for parts, though I think it's pushing a bit, not counting Kapil) none has comparable peer ratings. And he could bat to boot (India's first Test half centurion).
@subshakerz got a new disciple
 

Silver Silva

International Regular
Top 5 batsmen Jadeja has dismissed the most in Tests :

1.Angelo Mathews - 8 times
2.Joe Root - 8 times
3.Steven Smith - 8 times
4.Moeen Ali - 7 times
5.Alastair Cook - 7 times

Bar Moeen Ali these are all very good to great batsmen , a sign of a great bowler.
 

ma1978

International Debutant
Like we should do for Barry Richards, Mike Procter, George Headley, Graeme Pollock, Clive Rice and Vincent van der Bijl??
George Headley had a full test career and Grae Pollock some sample sizing

The others are irrelevant as far as test cricket goes

And Amar Singh really can’t compare to any of those anyhow because he was premodern and had very little first class sample size
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
I am glad he his willing to allow it to enter his equation.
I always do, for old players as with time stats becomes more and more numbers..... I won't give a **** in my present ratings if a bunch of experts rates Kohli over Smith, because I have the context. Now, for players in early 20th Century, I simply don't have that luxury. I don't know how the runs were scored, so if everyone basically agrees that Trumper scored many more tough runs, was otherworldly at peak and suffered from health issues; I have to rank him ahead of Hill, doesn't matter how Coronis takes it.
 

capt_Luffy

Cricketer Of The Year
George Headley had a full test career and Grae Pollock some sample sizing

The others are irrelevant as far as test cricket goes

And Amar Singh really can’t compare to any of those anyhow because he was premodern and had very little first class sample size
Had wonderful English tours, was rated by Len Hutton as the best he faced, Bedser among the very best he saw, averages 18 in FC. If Jack Cowie qualifies for NZ, can't see why Amar Singh doesn't for India.
 

Top