Okay here are some semi coherent thoughts
Me saying salt>>>Jacks has become a bit of a meme, but honestly I’m not fully bought into Jacks. I like the look of our top five as a collective but Jacks hasn’t sold me at all. And that over, less said the better.
Giving Jacks the second over was just matchup obsession gone mad. A great start from Moeen and we squandered it. If you really wanted an offy then throw the ball to Livingstone? But really - just throw it to Joffra, no?
We were sloppy in the field, I reckon 10-15 runs could have been saved. And when we batter, Australia made no such mistake.
A couple of the wide calls against Jordan were harsh, one in particular was ridiculous, but he gave away too many extras overall.
Joffra bowled well and I thought Moeen did okay, as did Rashid.
Hindsight being what it is, I guess we needed a 100+ partnership for the openers to really be in the game. Jacks dithered, and the less said about Bairstow’s innings the better. He was the main culprit in the field too. He gets a lot of unfair stick at times but he stunk the joint out today.
I get we’ve earmarked Brook for the finisher role, and that’s all well and good, but what use is holding back a finisher when you’re so far behind the 8 ball?
Moeen batted okay, about what you’d reasonably expect from him I guess. Livingstone was frustrating, and I’m a fan of his.
Baby and bathwater come to mind, so probably don’t need to overreact, but Topley should come in for Wood. What Jordan adds in the field shouldn’t be underestimated, so don’t count me in the ‘get him out’ camp but Curran in for him wouldn’t be the worst move.
If any of the batsmen were to drop out, I’d shift Jacks. Bairstow is on thin ice sure, but he has a lot more in the bank than Jacks and the ‘bowling’ that WJ brings is not a factor worth any consideration as we saw today.
Onwards and upwards. I guess we could come to rue that abandonment against Scotland, but shouldn’t be beyond us to put big wins on the board in the next two and go from there.