TheJediBrah
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yes I am better than those pathetic virtue signallersThis is some dumbass virtue signalling against virtue signalling.
Last edited:
Yes I am better than those pathetic virtue signallersThis is some dumbass virtue signalling against virtue signalling.
I mean we've seen the real side of Clarke now. I don't consider him a particularly altruistic personThis is some dumbass virtue signalling against virtue signalling.
Jayasurias was fine. India had scored 500 odd and Jayasuria got out at 615. Hayden's was in a win.Lara's, Hayden's and Jayasuriya's knocks are all strong contenders. Any 200/300 hit after the match result is virtually known is a contender for the most terrible knock.
Yeah that Jayasuriya knock was of no fault of his. Not sure at which session he got out. But Srilanka should have declared after he got out and tried bowling India out cheaply in the second innings.Jayasurias was fine. India had scored 500 odd and Jayasuria got out at 615. Hayden's was in a win.
Laras is unforgivable especially since England got out in their first innings for less than 300. WI could have easily batted twice and won the game on the last day.
I don't think there's any way that test gets a result without an extra day. Jayasuriya got out in the fourth over of the last day with a lead of only 78. Considering how easy the pitch was for batting it would have been very hard to bowl India out in time to chase.Yeah that Jayasuriya knock was of no fault of his. Not sure at which session he got out. But Srilanka should have declared after he got out and tried bowling India out cheaply in the second innings.
Yeah good point. SL batting until 900+ makes the Jayasuriya innings look worse than it wasJayasurias was fine. India had scored 500 odd and Jayasuria got out at 615. Hayden's was in a win.
Laras is unforgivable especially since England got out in their first innings for less than 300. WI could have easily batted twice and won the game on the last day.
Yes, you've mentioned Lara 3 times in 3 pages, we get it. You disagreed, I don't.Jayasurias was fine. India had scored 500 odd and Jayasuria got out at 615. Hayden's was in a win.
Laras is unforgivable especially since England got out in their first innings for less than 300. WI could have easily batted twice and won the game on the last day.
I accept your points but I can't respect any cricketer literally choosing self glory over team achievement. And I am a Lara fan (yes it's true).Yes, you've mentioned Lara 3 times in 3 pages, we get it. You disagreed, I don't.
We were not a good team, and the memory of the record will last longer than a single victory. Hayden's was seen as serious punching down and Lara and the Caribbean for the most part wanted him to reclaim it.
Here's the scorecard for Rowe's triple.* I've heard excellent things about Lawrence Rowe, it wasn't on a total road and the attack was strong
For 12 months that bowling line up of Anderson + Broad + Tremlet + Bresnan was absolute nightmare for any batting line .Can only remember Karun Nair's, Amla's, Gooch's and Lara's two efforts in any detail because obviously they were against England. Arguably Lara's 375 was the better of the two innings that he played. I would say that Amla's knock at the Oval was the best. I saw a good chunk of that in the flesh too. That set the tone for the series and deflated England straight away. Swann was severely neutered for that series and was never the same bowler after that point. Tim Bresnan, in one match went from having a bowling average of 25 to above 30 and he was brutally exposed after his elbow operation as not being quick enough to take out top batsmen.
It's a fair comment, that's why I reckoned Amla's innings could be claimed to be the best of those triple tons that I watched in any detail. It wasn't an innings that relied on doing it against very weak bowling and although the Oval was/is batting friendly it wasn't on the same level as the Antigua Recreation Ground.For 12 months that bowling line up of Anderson + Broad + Tremlet + Bresnan was absolute nightmare for any batting line .
I've talked to a guy who played in that game, and was dismissed by Shoaib in that innings...it's hyperbole, generally, when a batsman says they couldn't see the ball, but there were many deliveries where the NZ guys genuinely couldn't. If you watch the highlights, it's six guys either lbw or bowled, who don't even react or move. He said the changing room was akin to something you'd find in a World War bunker, guys white as a sheet post-innings or frightened to pop their head up and bat.* Inzaman did it in a game where Shoaib took 6/11 (though peak Shoaib could do **** like that)
Haha the highlights video of that spell is just shoaib spamming 150 kph yorkers constantly, insane to watchI've talked to a guy who played in that game, and was dismissed by Shoaib in that innings...it's hyperbole, generally, when a batsman says they couldn't see the ball, but there were many deliveries where the NZ guys genuinely couldn't. If you watch the highlights, it's six guys either lbw or bowled, who don't even react or move. He said the changing room was akin to something you'd find in a World War bunker, guys white as a sheet post-innings or frightened to pop their head up and bat.