Coronis
International Coach
Maybe if he played tests for more than 1 yearTed McDonald>Jack Gregory
Maybe if he played tests for more than 1 yearTed McDonald>Jack Gregory
Gregory himself played only 24 Tests.... Not to mention according to every report and writing; McDonald was the bowler with skills while Gregory was just fast.Maybe if he played tests for more than 1 year
He literally played 1 year of test cricket. Should I rate Barry Richards as a better test batsman than Graeme Pollock too?Gregory himself played only 24 Tests.... Not to mention according to every report and writing; McDonald was the bowler with skills while Gregory was just fast.
I answered who was the best bowler imo; not the best test bowler.....He literally played 1 year of test cricket. Should I rate Barry Richards as a better test batsman than Graeme Pollock too?
He got smashed at home and in SA and pissed off to play league cricket in England once he found out how much friendlier it was for his bowling.
By that logic Graeme Hick is the best batsman to average below 40. And Ramprakash and Bevan compete for the below 30 spot.I answered who was the best bowler imo; not the best test bowler.....
Hick over Grace, Trumper and Hill?? Yeah......By that logic Graeme Hick is the best batsman to average below 40. And Ramprakash and Bevan compete for the below 30 spot.
Well he has more hundreds and a higher average than all 3. Must’ve been better.Hick over Grace, Trumper and Hill?? Yeah......
Frank Woolley has more hundreds than Bradman and Merchant a higher average than Hobbs..... But you very well know what I was talking about.Well he has more hundreds and a higher average than all 3. Must’ve been better.
50% of his wickets were ATG batsmen, how many bowlers can claim that?Since we have a Bradman vs Answer thread, I nominate Bradman as the answer to this thread.
The Answer, as always, is JadejaThis is just a transparent attempt to engineer a thread where the answer is not Jadeja. All I can say is wait til the end of his career and see what he averages then.
George Hirst averaged exactly 30I answered who was the best bowler imo; not the best test bowler.....
I would say he definitely was very innovative and tough to play for his time; but overall was he better than the likes of Nawaz and Chatfield (aka, the borderline ones in my Top 10?)George Hirst averaged exactly 30
Absolutely. Not even close I don't think.Flintoff over Harmison for me.