• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Do SC Pacers Deserve More Credit For Home Performances?

Sunil1z

International Regular
What great spinners were there for Kapil?
My example was for current Indian fast bowlers .
Your point is valid for Kapil but the biggest argument against him is lack of success in Pak/Eng . He was a swing bowler. Should have done well there .
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
My example was for current Indian fast bowlers .
Your point is valid for Kapil but the biggest argument against him is lack of success in Pak/Eng . He was a swing bowler. Should have done well there .
It's a major discredit to Shami to say he just feeds off Ashwin Jadeja pressure.
 

Bolo.

International Captain
I mean, this is kinda of my point. You need something extraordinary to produce worldclass figures as a pacer in Pakistan over an entire career compared to playing on greentops.

Even in India with Kapil, to achieve his 26 average over an entire career to me would likely be a sub-25 effort in SENA.
Hard greentops? Ya, but they are very rare.

You need an exceptionally specific set of skills to succeed. Looking at how the Pak reverse bowlers did in relation to other bowlers home/away, you don't need to be exceptionally good at that skill though. I think the specificity of the skillset would be more useful in explaining having having fewer quality bowlers than lauding the good ones though. They may have produced some great Mcgrath types in the era if decks were different.

Conversely, the specificity of the skillset may explain why they have underperformed away in relation to other ATGs from the era. See Eng bowlers in general.

I do rate Kapil at home higher than if he'd been from a bunch of other countries. I'm never that keen to rate HTBs that highly though.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The point is if a pacer does well in a certain set of conditions understood to be harder and loses out on easier conditions, that does raise suspicion on the matter whether he should be given extra points for doing well where it’s harder. Maybe his bowling style is suited to that
It's the same with spinners, eg. Lyon in Australia. Suited to Australia so does better than almost anyone there but take him to India and he'll be outperformed by the home spinners easily

Some of that might be down to who he's bowling to compared to them but not all of it
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Hard greentops? Ya, but they are very rare.

You need an exceptionally specific set of skills to succeed. Looking at how the Pak reverse bowlers did in relation to other bowlers home/away, you don't need to be exceptionally good at that skill though. I think the specificity of the skillset would be more useful in explaining having having fewer quality bowlers than lauding the good ones though. They may have produced some great Mcgrath types in the era if decks were different.

Conversely, the specificity of the skillset may explain why they have underperformed away in relation to other ATGs from the era. See Eng bowlers in general.

I do rate Kapil at home higher than if he'd been from a bunch of other countries. I'm never that keen to rate HTBs that highly though.
Your entire framing makes it sound like Pak pacers were destined to succeed there and pitches for a non-factor. Devalues their home achievements IMO given the difficulty of physical conditions regardless of how they did away which is another debate.
 

HouHsiaoHsien

International Debutant
It's the same with spinners, eg. Lyon in Australia. Suited to Australia so does better than almost anyone there but take him to India and he'll be outperformed by the home spinners easily

Some of that might be down to who he's bowling to compared to them but not all of it
Subz are you listening??
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Why do you think he wouldn't? He didn't swing it because as he developed he didn't have to. People don't develop their MOs in a vacuum.
It's a big questionmark since swing is a fundamental element of SC success and I never saw Ambrose do it.
 

Top