• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Is Ravichandran Ashwin an ATG test bowler?

Is Ravichandran Ashwin an ATG test bowler?


  • Total voters
    75

ma1978

International Debutant
See how at least there is cricketing discussion the moment someone stops posting?


FWIW, I think Ashwin is a top 5 spinner of all time and therefore an ATG. If your definition of ATG restricts you to just 3 spinners or something, then I guess it makes sense he is not an ATG. Otherwise, I dont think there is a case to not call him an ATG.

it’s the same group that struggles to call Steve Waugh or Shaun Pollock ATGs
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
it’s the same group that struggles to call Steve Waugh or Shaun Pollock ATGs
TBF, that is a lilttle bit more understandable although, now that I think about it, I do think Shaun Pollock more than deserves to be an ATG as a test cricketer overall.
 

ma1978

International Debutant
It wasn't a thing when we were discussing Sehwag a while ago, with a similar freak out for the same reasons.
Sehwag makes it on subcontinental achievements alone. When you’re the best ever in half the cricket world nothing else matters
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
See how at least there is cricketing discussion the moment someone stops posting?


FWIW, I think Ashwin is a top 5 spinner of all time and therefore an ATG. If your definition of ATG restricts you to just 3 spinners or something, then I guess it makes sense he is not an ATG. Otherwise, I dont think there is a case to not call him an ATG.
We had a discussion the moment we shifted from Ashwin and started talking about ATGs standards in general.

But glad you belatedly have moderated your position. Kudos.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
I absolutely think Kallis has a casefor the greatest ever all rounder and Wasim would open my attack.

And no SENA was created on this board and certain sections of the media to reflect the fears of a certain generation of Indian fan. It’s not a location, a country, a common environment for cricket (neither is the SC btw). No Australian orSouth African or even English fan differentiates so much about how their players do away from home.
Ten minutes listening to SEN talkback radio earlier this summer would rapidly disabuse you of this notion. Warner being a hack HTB is actually a reasonably common view in Australia, though probably not a majority one.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
And we are back. It was fun while it lasted. :(


Here is a question to the mods - Over the last 2 years, every single bloody damn time someone has had something complementary to say about Indian cricket, Ashwin, Jadeja or the current side, this guy has literally popped up in every thread arguing the same nonsense over and over again, even though it has been conclusively proven that his "logic" is always wrong and he only shifts goalposts. Yet, it is page after page of the same nonsense. And then he comes here to pontificate with a crony that "the other side" are too rigid in their position.

The point about Ashwin being an ATG was already answered very clearly very early in the thread. All salty has to do is post his opinion and move on, but no, we can't have that. It has to be page after page of the same biased insecure idiotic hatred full nonsense.


@subshakerz - simple advice to you. You have said what you feel. Move on and let others discuss the topic as its clear there is no rationality in your discussions on this topic. Is it really that difficult?

And FWIW, I never engaged with anyone who thinks only the top 3 spinners belong in their ATG llist, although I do think Ash has a pretty arguable case even then. The only engagement here was with two people who posted the same insecure idiocy coz they cant stomach the success and greatness of the player in question.
 

Xix2565

International Regular
Not all pitches in the subcontinent, or all pitches in fast bowling friendly countries are the same. So in that case the evaluation by countries generally shouldn't matter as much because the conditions present when the player played should be taken into account. Pitches in the past in certain countries weren't as they are now and that should be remembered when it comes to saying X player did well in Y country.
 

ma1978

International Debutant
I would call a 42 average in Australia fine. Its like calling Ponting in India fine because he had two decent tours towards the end, yet all here call him a failure.
I consider Ponting anything but a failure and one of the greatest bats to ever play the game
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
And we are back. It was fun while it lasted. :(


Here is a question to the mods - Over the last 2 years, every single bloody damn time someone has had something complementary to say about Indian cricket, Ashwin, Jadeja or the current side, this guy has literally popped up in every thread arguing the same nonsense over and over again, even though it has been conclusively proven that his "logic" is always wrong and he only shifts goalposts. Yet, it is page after page of the same nonsense. And then he comes here to pontificate with a crony that "the other side" are too rigid in their position.

The point about Ashwin being an ATG was already answered very clearly very early in the thread. All salty has to do is post his opinion and move on, but no, we can't have that. It has to be page after page of the same biased insecure idiotic hatred full nonsense.


@subshakerz - simple advice to you. You have said what you feel. Move on and let others discuss the topic as its clear there is no rationality in your discussions on this topic. Is it really that difficult?

And FWIW, I never engaged with anyone who thinks only the top 3 spinners belong in their ATG llist, although I do think Ash has a pretty arguable case even then. The only engagement here was with two people who posted the same insecure idiocy coz they cant stomach the success and greatness of the player in question.
I object to you calling @kyear2 my crony and suggest we all relax and take it down a notch.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Not all pitches in the subcontinent, or all pitches in fast bowling friendly countries are the same. So in that case the evaluation by countries generally shouldn't matter as much because the conditions present when the player played should be taken into account. Pitches in the past in certain countries weren't as they are now and that should be remembered when it comes to saying X player did well in Y country.
This is a Good Post.
 

Top