• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Is Ravichandran Ashwin an ATG test bowler?

Is Ravichandran Ashwin an ATG test bowler?

  • Total voters
    75
honestbharani

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Socerer 01 said:
you’re omitting the whole part where subs frequently indulges in misery posting on every Indian loss but conveniently disappears when they win yet somehow turns up right on time when India loses, his weird posting in those best teams of 2023 or 2024 where he refused to acknowledge India in that convo seriously while hyping bazballing England who despite playing impressive cricket hadnt achieved as much and him trying to insert himself into every discussion on certain Indian spinners on this forum at all times, including creating threads to do it

in this very thread he’s taken the convo into random tangents, misinterpreted words to create false narratives such as others bringing down other greats to make Ashwin look great when they havent done that, accused people supporting Ashwin of doing so only for nationalistic prejudice, accused people of creating false greats like Walsh and Anderson to make Ashwin look great and then turned around to make a list saying people have been dissing on these players as slander. people like you who come in after 40 pages only see the 1 user who insulted him and believe the narratives he weaves because surprise surprise, he has the most posts in this thread by far which makes it easy to control the narrative against multiple other users who have different opinions and views even if they all think Ashwin is a great

fwiw i dont think subs is inherently biased against Indian players or anything but i wont blame anyone accusing him of that when he’s given enough ammunition to do them by now over the years to do so, that doesnt excuse the **** he gets either
Click to expand...

Like I have said many times before, I have absolutely no issues with hate posting against a particular country's cricket or cricketers. Its the frequency and volume that is the issue. Post once or twice on things you hate but let it ****ing go when its obvious the majority are not that idiotic or biased. This volume and frequency is what brings forum atmosphere rule into play.
 
M

ma1978

International Debutant
honestbharani said:
Like I have said many times before, I have absolutely no issues with hate posting against a particular country's cricket or cricketers. Its the frequency and volume that is the issue. Post once or twice on things you hate but let it ****ing go when its obvious the majority are not that idiotic or biased. This volume and frequency is what brings forum atmosphere rule into play.
Click to expand...
He does have a weird obsession with Ashwin and Jadeja. All his posts about India in some way related to denigrating their accomplishments.

But addressing this on the merits, there is literally no argument for Ashwin not being an ATG unless someone wants to be contrary or racist.
 
kyear2

kyear2

International Coach
Xix2565 said:
Can't take jokes, I see.

Apparently it's pulling people down when I ask for a proper demonstration of standards, but this level of junk posting is all fine huh @Spark?
Click to expand...
You're well aware of what pitches O'Reilly bowled on, it was one of the two flattest eras. There was nothing spiced up about it.

And that's what the modus operandi has been by you, and you regard junk posting anyone who disagrees with you.

You're the only one calling people idiots and other personal attacks by the way.
 
S

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
honestbharani said:
Like I have said many times before, I have absolutely no issues with hate posting against a particular country's cricket or cricketers. Its the frequency and volume that is the issue. Post once or twice on things you hate but let it ****ing go when its obvious the majority are not that idiotic or biased. This volume and frequency is what brings forum atmosphere rule into play.
Click to expand...
The fact you would float banning me for simply being stubborn and not accepting the party line like a censorship mob is a new low for you.

I also find it particularly odd given that I multiple times called to declare consensus and end this thread yet then had to respond the last 20 pages to rage posting from your clique.

Your obsession with me is unhealthy frankly and I suggest you take it easy and cool down your team.
 
X

Xix2565

International Regular
kyear2 said:
You're well aware of what pitches O'Reilly bowled on, it was one of the two flattest eras. There was nothing spiced up about it.

And that's what the modus operandi has been by you, and you regard junk posting anyone who disagrees with you.

You're the only one calling people idiots and other personal attacks by the way.
Click to expand...
I wasn't until Coronis came along, so no thanks to you. And yeah, this is junk from you because you can't seem to answer properly to anything I say for some bizarre reason.
 
S

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
ma1978 said:
But addressing this on the merits, there is literally no argument for Ashwin not being an ATG unless someone wants to be contrary or racist.
Click to expand...
This line of thinking is the source of all the problems of this thread.

You set up the thread as a debate and right off the bat delegitimise the other side.
 
X

Xix2565

International Regular
OverratedSanity said:
Tbf 40% of posters on CW being racist sounds like an accurate statistic, just not for the reasons he's saying.
Click to expand...
These people act like the voters can't be seen smh. Though I doubt that Subzi and co are racist, they just keep failing to put up an argument that holds water.
 
M

ma1978

International Debutant
P
AndyZaltzHair said:
Lol no you think theres 20 votes (41%) on 'No' because they just want to oppose or racists?
Click to expand...
When someone has 500 wickets sub 24, yes

BTW, I feel the same way on Anderson

Anyone who doesn’t consider him an ATG is being intellectually contrary to show how smart or knowledgeable they are by having a non mainstream opinion.

And btw, most people post on here to be contrary
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Top