CricAddict
Cricketer Of The Year
Stupid from the selectors to not take Santner in the last 3 tests. A good spinner is required at least for the variety he provides.
Yeah, and the forecast is for hot weather on days 3-5. This surface is going to dry out and become torturous for RFM types.Stupid from the selectors to not take Santner in the last 3 tests. A good spinner is required at least for the variety he provides.
Fanny Schmeller?I approached him directly. He's the one that changed it. I even gave him an alternate if he found this one too rude.
Phillips taking a 5'fer in the second innings of the last test may have cost Santner a gig for this test.Stupid from the selectors to not take Santner in the last 3 tests. A good spinner is required at least for the variety he provides.
Uncanny!Fanny Schmeller?
Yes if this is a as-per-last-ten-years slow road then there will be a lot of toil for the medium pacers, and the pattern is that the team bowling first would be happy to concede 350 as they'll then score 550. Admittedly those pitches are terrible for spinners too - need top fast bowlers or very top spinners to make a difference.Yeah, and the forecast is for hot weather on days 3-5. This surface is going to dry out and become torturous for RFM types.
I was thinking that earlier. If Stead didn't think the part timers could fill the gap, then Santner would have had a much better chance.Phillips taking a 5'fer in the second innings of the last test may have cost Santner a gig for this test.
We have Ravindra too who can bowl the same sort of left arm spin as Santner although not as well.
It should've told him that we might have ****ing actually had another wicket taker instead. The ****ing moronPhillips taking a 5'fer in the second innings of the last test may have cost Santner a gig for this test.
We have Ravindra too who can bowl the same sort of left arm spin as Santner although not as well.
Phillips taking a 5'fer in the second innings of the last test may have cost Santner a gig for this test.
We have Ravindra too who can bowl the same sort of left arm spin as Santner although not as well.
I don't necessarily disagree with this line of thinking either tbh. Santner was not a particularly good test spin bowler in his first run in the team, there's a little to suggest that he's bowling better in the last 12 months, but not lots of evidence. His batting is decent but at 8, his bowling is the first skill.I was thinking that earlier. If Stead didn't think the part timers could fill the gap, then Santner would have had a much better chance.
MoooBat until the cows come home it seem like
Ironically this is the kind of thinking which used to get Santner selected ahead of more specialist spinners a few years ago. Typical that they don’t select him when he’s improved.I was thinking that earlier. If Stead didn't think the part timers could fill the gap, then Santner would have had a much better chance.