honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
And when we dont, whinging.I dont buy it was all some weird natural circumstances. It seems to happen often when India tours, not really complaining though, its fun and gives us a better chance of winning.
And when we dont, whinging.I dont buy it was all some weird natural circumstances. It seems to happen often when India tours, not really complaining though, its fun and gives us a better chance of winning.
Honestly even around 100 it might've gotten tense. Anything in double digits no matter how dodgy the wicket it pretty just takes a couple of slogs to make it a cakewalk though generally.A lead of around 150 to 200 and that could have been an exciting finish, that lead of 78 was never going to be enough unless India batted like idiots.
Racist tbh from SA.Absolute memefest of a game, but great win.
Wish SA gave us these ridiculous landmine pitches more often tbh, we literally always win when they do.
we kinda didthat lead of 78 was never going to be enough unless India batted like idiots
How about 81?We were never gonna get 200 here. The max we could have chased would be around 130 imo.
That seems like a number lesser than 130How about 81?
Referencing 81 all out at Bridgetown 1997.That seems like a number lesser than 130
Nah blaming techniques is wild. Did you see what the **** the ball was doing?Certainly the weakest Proteas side since re admission. Their batting is certainly the weakest in living memory with no one averaging over 40 and about to get even weaker with Elgar retiring.
The short nature of the game a symptom of a poor pitch and the international focus on T20 cricket meaning we are producing batters who have poor technique, short patience and a lack of guts. Where are the Boycotts, Athertons, Kirstens and Kallis who can bat all day and survive difficult conditions. Sad state of the modern game and making me lose interest in cricket as a product.
Nah man, Im all for mocking modern batsmen's defensive failings, but this pitch was unplayable.Certainly the weakest Proteas side since re admission. Their batting is certainly the weakest in living memory with no one averaging over 40 and about to get even weaker with Elgar retiring.
The short nature of the game a symptom of a poor pitch and the international focus on T20 cricket meaning we are producing batters who have poor technique, short patience and a lack of guts. Where are the Boycotts, Athertons, Kirstens and Kallis who can bat all day and survive difficult conditions. Sad state of the modern game and making me lose interest in cricket as a product.
Didn't watch the game but we have played on crap pitches before and not been rolled for 55. I think the team from circa 2010 would have posted at least 150. But then again I didn't watch the game.Nah blaming techniques is wild. Did you see what the **** the ball was doing?
they didnt face mighty miyaan thoughDidn't watch the game but we have played on crap pitches before and not been rolled for 55. I think the team from circa 2010 would have posted at least 150. But then again I didn't watch the game.
Low key underrated performance from Hammond there.WI vs ENG Cricket Scorecard, 1st Test at Bridgetown, January 08 - 10, 1935
Get cricket scorecard of 1st Test, WI vs ENG, England tour of West Indies 1934/35 at Kensington Oval, Bridgetown, Barbados dated January 08 - 10, 1935.www.espncricinfo.com
And this is the shortest match in which both teams batted all 4 innings