honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
He was the difference between the sides IMO last tour. But it was always as the 3rd seamer.
Probably not. I did wonder about Trent bridge in 2015 after Aus were dismissed for 60, but that took best part of 20 overs for England to establish a lead. Another contender might be that Pakistan vs Australia series that was played in the UAE (I think). iirc Pakistan were dismissed for 50ish a couple of times, and Australia wouldnt have hung around establishing a lead if Pakistan had batted first.I wonder if a first innings lead has ever been achieved in a lesser number of overs.
fair enough as long as they don't complain about asian bunsensSouth Africa give England flatter tracks for their crowds and Australia flatter tracks because of their bowling attacks. The Asian teams get snakepits.
There's a reason why Graeme Smith struggled against Ind/SL/Pak at home despite those sides generally not having very good pace attacks in his time. Pakistan's were decent.
Quite funny that the bunsens get more stick than day 3 wickets in South Africa that are just as lopsided, but also dangerous.fair enough as long as they don't complain about asian bunsens
Yes. Rabada has been very good. The rest have generally missed their mark. Sharma's approach is correct.The non Rabada overs are very juicy
Both this series and last. Pujara kept getting hit on the gloves every other ball.I said that second Sharma not out could be high. It's on his way up. The carry and leap off full lengths on the wickets in this test series has been quite staggering.
its what makes away tests funQuite funny that the bunsens get more stick than day 3 wickets in South Africa that are just as lopsided, but also dangerous.
Happened on occasion in the late 90s too iirc. India and SL got some ridiculous pitches, but some of the ones rolled out for Australia were unusually slow.South Africa give England flatter tracks for their crowds and Australia flatter tracks because of their bowling attacks. The Asian teams get snakepits.