must admit looking at the aussie batting order does look a tad thin, not that England 6-11 has exactly oodles of runs this World CupGreen and Stoinis to come after Inglis
This is as they say, not very good
The scorer on TMS is travelling between every match he covers by train, he's had a number of 30 hour plus journeys, but he's also had plenty of stories to tell too.Organised sports tours are always a bad idea, but imagine paying for one of these
Don't think it's a high scoring wicket at least for the moment. Ball seems to get hold up on the wicket.Marnus is being particularly ordinary here so far. Puts a lot of pressure on the rest of the line up
he has a poor ODI record might be a starting point, had a good 2019 World Cup but averages near 40 before this game and may even reach that average (2969 runs, 75 wickets @ 39.59 so 0/31 or worse would crack 40)Comms asking why Wood hasn’t been effective so far this tourney. NOt Particularly surE why he’D do So badly.
and cooler to field second?Ahmedabad does get better under lights. I think NZ smashed Eng here and Ind smashed Pak, both games the conditions did look easier batting second. I dont think they looked particularly difficult batting first either game, mind you.
Livingstone batting was fine before franchise cricket came along. His early first class batting average was good.Livingstone is a better bowler than batsman, how did he trick everyone that he's a batsman
simple couple of answers, county cricket and shortest formats ie 120 balls or lessLivingstone is a better bowler than batsman, how did he trick everyone that he's a batsman
Livingstone is a decent seven in this format. I know he's a pretty sloppy bat but with a good top six, then he really should be there just to accelerate the scoring rather than building a massive innings. His bowling is more than decent. You'll get ten overs from him often though you'd like the luxury of a sixth bowler too.Livingstone batting was fine before franchise cricket came along. His early first class batting average was good.
you'd have to mean ODIs by "short form", he has 45 wkts @ 18.47 in T20is, ER 8.35Wood just isn't a good short form bowler. He never has been besides a decent 2019. No other nation would give a guy averaging 40 over 60 ODIs
He followed up his breakthrough 2016 season with a decent 2017 inc a HS of 224. Did his head take over afterwards after short format success?Livingstone is a decent seven in this format. I know he's a pretty sloppy bat but with a good top six, then he really should be there just to accelerate the scoring rather than building a massive innings. His bowling is more than decent. You'll get ten overs from him often though you'd like the luxury of a sixth bowler too.