Yeah, a genuinely great comparison.This is too close to call for me. I honestly don't know.
Best way to put it imo.but I think Steyn is basically to fast bowling what Lara is to batting.
That is cop out.Yeah, a genuinely great comparison.
I'm going for Steyn on the cop out criteria of "great bowlers have a marginally higher impact on most teams than great batsmen" - but I think Steyn is basically to fast bowling what Lara is to batting.
We know. I'm quoting you.If only I admitted that in my post.
Oh wait...
Good way to put it. It's a tough one. Both were virtually peerless when they got on a roll and the playing surface/quality of opposition basically stopped mattering. Steyn would be my favourite cricketer of all time if VVS didn't exist so I'm giving him my biased vote.I think Steyn is basically to fast bowling what Lara is to batting.
But you said you haven't seen Marshall and Hadlee?Lara is the best batsman I have seen. Steyn is NOT the best bowler I have seen. So, Lara.
Thakur.But you said you haven't seen Marshall and Hadlee?
Atleast he could bat unlike a certain AustralianThakur.
It’s a shame you haven’t seen Sachin batLara is the best batsman I have seen. Steyn is NOT the best bowler I have seen. So, Lara.
Far superior.Atleast he could bat unlike a certain Australian
Daily Reminder that Lara > SachinIt’s a shame you haven’t seen Sachin bat
I think Sachin is greater, but Lara, especially at his best was better. But I also think Lara at his best is better than anyone ever.Daily Reminder that Lara > Sachin