Heheheh"No-rounder" my steaming ass. The bloke is a superb batsman.
I've heard a rumour people score quite a lot in the last 15 overs in these last uhh maybe 13 odd years of ODIsAthers saying that we would settle for a score of 260 or 270 now but even that is looking optimistic at this stage with how slow we are scoring.
I agree, Latham and Phillips are doing the right thing here, keeping wickets intact right now is more important than the run rate.Things have slowed down obviously but run rate is secondary at the moment. NZ need to set a platform.
Yeah it doesn't get pointed out often here (because NZ in particular don't play that much ODI cricket of late) but strike rotation has long been an area of weakness for NZ.I have patience/hope that we can improve our position here, but the batting over the last 10 overs or so hasn’t been good. Not a question of ‘intent’, just poor execution of picking up 1s and 2s
You need wickets in hand to do that though, another quick couple of wickets here and we won't be scoring much off the last 15 overs.I've heard a rumour people score quite a lot in the last 15 overs in these last uhh maybe 13 odd years of ODIs
Yeah makes him vulnerable to getting worked over. Can remember a T20 couple of years ago where Ashwin pretty much walked over him in 3 or 4 deliveries.I've said it before, but I do hate it when Phillips plays every ball from the spinner off the back foot
edit: oooh close 6er
Yes but it’s also valid to say that 50(60) or 50(65) were even more required and were achievable with better (not simply higher risk) battingIt's unexciting, but partnership of 50(75) exactly what was required to halt the mini collapse.