honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
y not both?Are you assuming 5 bowlers, or jadeja batting ahead of the keeper?
y not both?Are you assuming 5 bowlers, or jadeja batting ahead of the keeper?
Cos the he would be batting 6?y not both?
ah, I misunderstood then,Cos the he would be batting 6?
4/5 bowlers potentially changes things. 5 means you are getting very short of batting. The extra bowling is worth a lot more if 4.
I'd say Jadeja provides more value as a bowler, personally. Botham a notably better bat though, best on this list.How is Jadeja a better batsman or bowler than Botham? He is neither
I just don’t see it, Botham was a frontline top of the attack pace bowler. Jadeja is a very effective bit pieceI'd say Jadeja provides more value as a bowler, personally. Botham a notably better bat though, best on this list.
Depends on which Botham you get, as always with him. Jadeja is very, very good on home turning tracks, but not so good aside from that, but on the whole I think he still ends up being more reliable than Botham as a bowler.I just don’t see it, Botham was a frontline top of the attack pace bowler. Jadeja is a very effective bit piece
When did Botham become the answer?Fair enough but I honestly would still pick the best batsman at 7 out of the available options and go from there.
In short, The Answer.
He is easily the better spinner.How is Jadeja a better batsman or bowler than Botham? He is neither
If he played in the 50s, he’d be rated in cw’s top 10 cricketers. Best cricketer of the modern eraMan averages 20 when bowling
This is bull**** those are easy bowling tracks
Man averages 40 on same tracks when batting
He’s a flat track bully
If the keeper is averaging 24 then Jadeja would definitely bat ahead of him.Are you assuming 5 bowlers, or jadeja batting ahead of the keeper?
He literally has those numbers at home (batting 39.80, bowling 20.45)We talking about Jadeja? He doesn't have those numbers. Although his bowling numbers are still pretty impressive for an all-rounder.
Then, Why dont vote him?Upon reflection, I agree Wasim himself wouldn't be an all-rounder in my view. Neither would Marshall.
To me, all-rounder means someone capable of batting in the top seven and being one of five main bowlers.
Only Kapil Dev, Jadeja and Botham qualify. Out of those, I choose Kapil since he was a slightly better bowler.
Oh yeah, no one's doubting he's a goliath at home, and an all time great. For me, in either conditions he's a notable step below Ashwin as a bowler. I have Ashwin in my top 10 all time (either pacers or spinners).He literally has those numbers at home (batting 39.80, bowling 20.45)
And it’s even more exaggerated since 2016/2017 (you know, since these Indian tracks apparently became minefields), because his batting average shoots up because that’s when he really became a darn good bat.
In fact, even overall nevermind at home, this is his overall since:
2016: Batting 42.38, bowling 24.17
2018: Batting 44.00, bowling 24.57