• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Curtly Ambrose vs Brian Lara

Ambrose vs Lara


  • Total voters
    30

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Tough one. I am going to say Lara, ever so slightly. Lara is around 7 to 10 of my bats and Ambrose is number 6 on my pacer list.
 

Slifer

International Captain
Seriously? Ambrose all day. Ambrose was consistent home and away vs all comers. And if averaging sub 25 is roughly equivalent to averaging 50, then it's no contest. In the 90s, Lara famously came up 2nd best vs the likes of Donald, Wasim etc. Curtly afaic came up 2nd best to no one (generally speaking).

Funny enough, they both have the same bogey team ie India. Funny because they both played India almost exclusively at home. A real head scratcher that.
 

BazBall21

International Captain
Seriously? Ambrose all day. Ambrose was consistent home and away vs all comers. And if averaging sub 25 is roughly equivalent to averaging 50, then it's no contest. In the 90s, Lara famously came up 2nd best vs the likes of Donald, Wasim etc. Curtly afaic came up 2nd best to no one (generally speaking).

Funny enough, they both have the same bogey team ie India. Funny because they both played India almost exclusively at home. A real head scratcher that.
I think I would prefer Ambrose in my team too.
 

Slifer

International Captain
I think I would prefer Ambrose in my team too.
I generally judge players on 3 main metrics to start off with: their overall stats, record vs the best, then their home and away performances. Ambrose and Lara both have overall great stats. Lara's would be better if he had more not outs but whatever. Then vs the best ie Australia both were great. Lastly, home and away. Lara was very very good outside the Caribbean but Ambrose was great overall. So Ambrose gets the edge.

It also helps that their careers tended to overlap as much as it did. Otherwise it might've been tougher to a separate them.
 
Last edited:

BazBall21

International Captain
I generally judge players on 3 main metrics to start off with: their overall stats, record vs the best, then their home and away performances. Ambrose and Lara both have overall great stats. Lara's would be better if he had more not outs but whatever. Then vs the best ie Australia both were great. Lastly, home and away. Lara was very very good outside the Caribbean but Ambrose was great overall. So Lara gets the edge.

It also helps that their careers tended to overlap as much as it did. Otherwise it might've been tougher to a separate them.
Lara would be the more valuable player in Asia. But I think anywhere outside Asia I'd prefer Ambrose except maybe on Antigua/Edgbaston type tracks. Especially against top teams, critically. Guess the argument for Lara would be his nineteen big hundreds as a critique of Ambrose in the second half of his career was his WPM.
 

Slifer

International Captain
Ranking the WI cricketers I'd go something like this top 10 only:

Sobers
Daylight
Marshall
Viv
Ambrose
Lara
Headley
Worrell
Garner
Holding
Walcott
 

BazBall21

International Captain
Ranking the WI cricketers I'd go something like this top 10 only:

Sobers
Daylight
Marshall
Viv
Ambrose
Lara
Headley
Worrell
Garner
Holding
Walcott
Good list. Love Walcott despite his mediocre away record. I tend to rate holding over Joel but that's a flick of a coin.
 

Slifer

International Captain
Good list. Love Walcott despite his mediocre away record. I tend to rate holding over Joel but that's a flick of a coin.
Yeah Walcott was so so away but I rate him mostly because he was also a decent wicket keeper. And he had back to back atg series vs two atg bowling attacks. And he still holds the record for most 100s in a series.
 

Coronis

International Coach
I generally judge players on 3 main metrics to start off with: their overall stats, record vs the best, then their home and away performances. Ambrose and Lara both have overall great stats. Lara's would be better if he had more not outs but whatever. Then vs the best ie Australia both were great. Lastly, home and away. Lara was very very good outside the Caribbean but Ambrose was great overall. So Lara gets the edge.

It also helps that their careers tended to overlap as much as it did. Otherwise it might've been tougher to a separate them.
lol seriously?

Lara averages 47 away from home and Ambrose averages 20 away from home but Lara has the better away record? You drunk mate?
 

Coronis

International Coach
Its funny actually, looking at the great West Indies batsmen.

Headley 77.56 home, 47.45 away
Weekes 69.14 home, 49.63 away
Sobers 66.80 home, 50.73 away
Walcott 69.83 home, 40.46 away
Lara 58.65 home, 48.26 away
Chanders 58.36 home, 45.44 away
Richards 49.77 home, 50.50 away
Worrell 55.41 home, 44.90 away
Lloyd 46.46 home, 46.80 away
Kanhai 48.63 home, 46.51 away
Greenidge 48.62 home, 42.22 away

*neutral = away for this list

Big list of HTB’s aside from Richards, Lloyd and Kanhai.

Also random shoutout to Darren Bravo. 26.78 at home, 46.78 away.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
lol seriously?

Lara averages 47 away from home and Ambrose averages 20 away from home but Lara has the better away record? You drunk mate?
Erm, as far as I'm aware great is better than very good and he voted for Ambrose precisely because of his better away record.
 

Top