Better stats overall. Better away stats and a more complete bowler plus faster. Marshall only had problem in NZ while Hadlee had in Pakistan and WI.For the record I was asking for the objective reasons. For someone who is a fan of Hadlee, there must be tangible reasons as to why you rate Marshall even marginally higher.
44Marshall is bullet-proof against every opponent. Hadlee averages 28 v Pakistan.
No tour of Pakistan in his prime scuppered his record there but I would still prefer Marshall in Pakistan. And Hadlee had an iffy series when Nzjaved Miandad flat tracks. Marshall saved the day against the same opponent in the same period. Albeit on livelier pitches.
Slightly more rounded record. Slightly more of a weapon. Picked up a ton of wickets despite (possibly) the the most competition in history. Better SR. Marginally better average. Etc.For the record I was asking for the objective reasons. For someone who is a fan of Hadlee, there must be tangible reasons as to why you rate Marshall even marginally higher.
Hard to argue against them being seen as the big 3.Yeah. Marshall is my goat but can make good cases for Hadlee and McGrath. Hadlee is probably the best cricketer of the three.
This was the reason English writers such as Christopher Martin-Jenkins rated Hadlee slightly behind Lillee and Marshall. They kept on attacking on docile surfaces while Hadlee cut his pace and waited for something to happen.I would prefer Marshall on a slow flat track to Hadlee and McGrath.
In his top 100 cricketers of all time, he had Dennis Lillee 19th and Richard Hadlee 25th.This was the reason English writers such as Christopher Martin-Jenkins rated Hadlee slightly behind Lillee and Marshall. They kept on attacking on docile surfaces while Hadlee cut his pace and waited for something to happen.
Martin-Jenkins reckoned Lillee and Marshall were the best fast bowlers during the second half of the twentieth century, followed by Hadlee. He saw plenty of all of them.
Anyone has a complete list of the top 100 or even top 10?In his top 100 cricketers of all time, he had Dennis Lillee 19th and Richard Hadlee 25th.
I'll type it out now from memory, be prepared for some slight English bias...Anyone has a complete list of the top 100 or even top 10?
Two points:This was the reason English writers such as Christopher Martin-Jenkins rated Hadlee slightly behind Lillee and Marshall. They kept on attacking on docile surfaces while Hadlee cut his pace and waited for something to happen.
Martin-Jenkins reckoned Lillee and Marshall were the best fast bowlers during the second half of the twentieth century, followed by Hadlee. He saw plenty of all of them from the 1960s onwards.
Imran 14 and Botham 18?I'll type it out now from memory, be prepared for some slight English bias...
1) Don Bradman
2) WG Grace
3) Garfield Sobers
4) Shane Warne
5) Jack Hobbs
6) Sachin Tendulkar
7) Sydney Barnes
8) Walter Hammond
9) Vivian Richards
10) Adam Gilchrist
11) Malcolm Marshall
12) Glenn McGrath
13) Muttiah Muralitharan
14) Imran Khan
15) Wilfred Rhodes
16) Keith Miller
17) Len Hutton
18) Ian Botham
19) Dennis Lillee
20) George Headley
21) Denis Compton
22) Fred Trueman
23) Bill O'Reilly
24) Brian Lara
25) Richard Hadlee
26) Sunil Gavaskar
27) Frederick Spofforth
28) Barry Richards
29) Alec Bedser
30) Victor Trumper
31) Ray Lindwall
32) Everton Weekes
33) Jim Laker
34) Wasim Akram
35) Kumar Singh Ranjithsingh
36) Waqar Younis
37) Graeme Pollock
38) Greg Chappell
39) Frank Worrell
40) Frank Woolley
41) Richie Benaud
42) Peter May
43) Herbert Sutcliffe
44) Graham Gooch
45) Clyde Walcott
46) Ken Barrington
47) Ricky Ponting
48) Kapil Dev
49) Harold Larwood
50) George Lohmann.
51) Curtly Ambrose
52) Jacques Kallis
53) Geoffrey Boycott
54) Clarrie Grimmett
55) Allan Border
56) Learie Constantine
57) Javed Miandad
58) Kumar Sangakkara
59) Hedley Verity
60) Kevin Pietersen
61) Arthur Shrewsbury
62) Bishen Bedi
63) Steve Waugh
64) Les Ames
65) Stanley McCabe
66) John Snow
67) Sanath Jayasuriya
68) Mike Proctor
69) Alan Knott
70) David Gower
71) Jack Gregory
72) Clive Lloyd
73) Martin Donnelly
74) Rahul Dravid
75) Ted Dexter
76) Andy Flower
77) Maurice Tate
78) Colin Cowdrey
79) Mahela Jayawardene
80) CB Fry
81) Bill Ponsford
82) Andrew Flintoff
83) Allan Donald
84) Gilbert Jessop
85) Michael Holding
86) Zaheer Abbas
87) Neil Harvey
88) Abdul Qadir
89) Brian Statham
90) Lance Gibbs
91) Ian Healy
92) Courtney Walsh
93) Graeme Smith
94) Virender Sehwag
95) Charlie Turner
96) Vijay Merchant
97) Shaun Pollock
98) Martin Crowe
99) Anil Kumble
100) Charles Macartney
This list was published in the summer of 2009.
Marshall didn't play before WSC.Why are we doing this chopping up career stuff again? Why not ignore Marshall's pre wsc stats as well?
There will naturally be some giant omissions but they only get bigger when you see who's at #82 and #91...Imran 14 and Botham 18?
Plus why is Sangakara 58 and Gilchrist at 10?
Ian Healy can be accepted given that he's arguably the greatest keeper of all time but including Flintoff is just asinine.There will naturally be some giant omissions but they only get bigger when you see who's at #82 and #91...
Haha. Flintoff over Donald, Holding, Pollock etc is bants. To be fair, Sanga at 58 at the time was pretty fair. Nine year career and his away record was only just starting to mature.Ian Healy can be accepted given that he's arguably the greatest keeper of all time but including Flintoff is just asinine.
Yeah I see. The list was from 2009.Haha. Flintoff over Donald, Holding, Pollock etc is bants. To be fair, Sanga at 58 at the time was pretty fair. Nine year career and his away record was only just starting to mature.