Averages have changed very little over time. Less than a run IIRC.why would you not adjust the average too
Both average the same. Afridi has 4 centuries compared 1 of Kapil. Afridi opened the batting too. So impact wise Afridi has played more impactful knocks.Kapil was good in both departments
Afridi I feel could've done a lot more batting wise
Afridi would make any odi side of his time as a bowlerBoth are very overrated but Afridi was a nothing player and Kapil was good
Other than for Sri Lanka.Afridi would make any odi side of his time as a bowler
Mendis and Jayasuriya have close to 0 overlap and Afridi debuted 12 years before Mendis did though.Other than for Sri Lanka.
I don't think he cuts above Murali and Mendis as from line spinners and above Jayasuriya as the fifth bowler.
Sanath Jayasuriya played from 1989-2011. Afridi 95-2015. I am not sure what you are talking about.Mendis and Jayasuriya have close to 0 overlap and Afridi debuted 12 years before Mendis did though.
Afridi would make the SL side as second spinner before Mendis debuted. Jayasuriya, Mendis and Murali didn't play a lot together. Afridi makes the SL side between 1996 and 2008 over Chandana.Sanath Jayasuriya played from 1989-2011. Afridi 95-2015. I am not sure what you are talking about.
No. Chandana was a better legspinner than Afridi.Afridi would make the SL side as second spinner before Mendis debuted. Jayasuriya, Mendis and Murali didn't play a lot together. Afridi makes the SL side between 1996 and 2008 over Chandana.
We are only discussing batting.Kapil averages 27 while Afridi 37. How are they same?
Kapil throughout his career Ranked under 25 as an ODI batsman and Afridi always above 25.Batting alone, Afridi did more. Both hitters but Dev did nothing of note bar 1 innings against pre-test Zimbo. Afridi had many highlights. Overall Dev is better as his bowling was far superior. Afridi's bowling is overrated. He was often ineffective.