subshakerz
Hall of Fame Member
So far, this series has been excellent. Will it reach the level of arguably the best Ashes series ever?
I think I'd more describe is at 2 good sides playing average cricket. Certain batsmen are well below their normal standards whilst the general level of fielding has been atrocious by one side and below average by the other.The 05 series was great cricket between 2 extremely good sides. This series is 2 average sides making lots of errors producing tight matches
aussies oft argue that England's use of subs for "comfort breaks" might count.....This is an entertaining series, but it's not even close as far as quality to the 2005 series.
Also, no one tried to cheat in 2005....
This Australian team is likely better than the 2005 England side.The 05 series was great cricket between 2 extremely good sides. This series is 2 average sides making lots of errors producing tight matches
Are you on drugs?This Australian team is likely better than the 2005 England side.
Yeah Bairstow trying to ping the stumps when Marnus clearly hadn't left the crease was pretty poor form.Also, no one tried to cheat in 2005...
It's the truth. That England side was a fine team but overall Cummins' side is more quality across conditions.Are you on drugs?
So you're saying that this Aussie team is better than 2005? You know, the one with Ponting, McGrath, Warne?It's the truth. That England side was a fine team but overall Cummins' side is more quality across conditions.
Of course not.So you're saying that this Aussie team is better than 2005? You know, the one with Ponting, McGrath, Warne?
no he meant they were better than England’s 2005 teamSo you're saying that this Aussie team is better than 2005? You know, the one with Ponting, McGrath, Warne?
Yeah, that England team beat the best Aussie team in the last 50 years.no he meant they were better than England’s 2005 team
Yeah but only when McGrath got injured.Yeah, that England team beat the best Aussie team in the last 50 years.