• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post in here if your team has won a Cricket World Championship in all three formats

Son Of Coco

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Can the mod's please ban any non Aussie posters who post in this thread? Violates the theme and ruins the vibes.
I agree. I mean, I assume any English posters who find their way in here are doing the internet version of backpacking.
 

ataraxia

International Coach
I mean the thing is. Nobody disputes that the final was tied. But England won the tournament. This cannot be disputed
But the fact of the matter is that it is being disputed. The tide (hehe tied) is not in your favour.
 

ataraxia

International Coach
It cannot accurately be disputed as it is a matter of fact
Well if you want to be all pedantic about it then yes indeed England were supposed to have won the 2019 World Cup. But evidently fans disagree, and rightly too
 

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Well if you want to be all pedantic about it then yes indeed England were supposed to have won the 2019 World Cup. But evidently fans disagree, and rightly too
No they don’t rightly disagree and they can’t rightly disagree. England lifted the trophy as winners of the WC. Everything else is just noise from insecure little boys and girls
 

ataraxia

International Coach
No they don’t rightly disagree and they can’t rightly disagree. England lifted the trophy as winners of the WC. Everything else is just noise from insecure little boys and girls
England lifted the trophy to grand discontent across the cricketing world and only as a result of some rule posited by a bureaucrat who couldn't have known the first thing about cricket. The symbolism of the trophy does not reflect who is perceived to be the real winner of the World Cup.
 

ataraxia

International Coach
Not to mention that England running so admirably near acquiring their first ODI World Cup victory, with the caveat that they were extremely fortunate to be dealt a home tournament, was itself only due to two New Zealanders and an Irishman: McCullum inspired Morgan to lead a new, aggressive England (oxymoron alert), and the side were carried to "victory" through noted Cantabrian Ben Stokes' sheer luck.

Anyone who claims that as a victory is kidding themselves.
 
Last edited:

GIMH

Norwood's on Fire
Not to mention that England running so admirably near acquiring their first ODI World Cup victory, with the caveat that they were extremely fortunate to be dealt a home tournament, was itself only due to two New Zealanders and an Irishman: McCullum inspired Morgan to lead a new, aggressive England (oxymoron alert), and the side were carried to victory through noted Cantabrian Ben Stokes' sheer luck.

Anyone who claims that as a victory is kidding themselves.
quite.

The rest of your post is drivel, but this works.
 

Fuller Pilch

Hall of Fame Member
Not to mention that England running so admirably near acquiring their first ODI World Cup victory, with the caveat that they were extremely fortunate to be dealt a home tournament, was itself only due to two New Zealanders and an Irishman...
That is not true!

It was also due to a Barbadian (Jofra) and whomever changed the rules to make him eligible, as well as blind umpires from Sri Lanka and South Africa.
 

Top