And both seemingly helped along by influential fathers.Without looking up stats I'm wondering who of Mitch Marsh and Zac Crawley have been blessed with most gifted selections
Surely 2 of the worst test batting records for top 6 batsmen who played 20 Tests or more?
I think to be a World Class all rounder you need to be able to win a game with both ball and bat. All 3 of those Englishman (and you could add in Moeen too) have done it at one point or another, maybe not consistently in some cases. I'm not sure Watson ever did with the ball and it remains to be seen whether Green can.Never really thought about Aussies lack of great all rounders, guess Shane Watson springs to mind although his progress always appeared hindered
due to his constant run ins with injuries.
I guess that's the question, who was the last Aussie to win a MOTM award for both bowling and batting?
I reckon Mitchell Johnson would've got a few since those two.Shane Warne or Michael Clarke.
Quick bowling all rounders are very rareIt's always puzzled me that for all the brilliant players that the Aussies have produced since I've been watching cricket, they've never had a really top class all rounder.
Considering we've produced Botham, Flintoff and Stokes- the Aussie cupboard has always been pretty bare.
Green is the 1st player you've had for decades who could genuinely be a WC all rounder.
You are covering 46 years of cricket with Botham, Flintoff and Stokes. Aus have had their share with Greg Matthews (averages over 40 with bat), Shane Watson and Andrew Symonds while Adam Gilchrist could be considered one of the best all-rounders ever. Then there is Green who has the potential to be better then them all ?It's always puzzled me that for all the brilliant players that the Aussies have produced since I've been watching cricket, they've never had a really top class all rounder.
Considering we've produced Botham, Flintoff and Stokes- the Aussie cupboard has always been pretty bare.
Green is the 1st player you've had for decades who could genuinely be a WC all rounder.
46 years is a long time and in that time the Aussies haven't had a top class all rounder, whilst England have had 3.You are covering 46 years of cricket with Botham, Flintoff and Stokes. Aus have had their share with Greg Matthews (averages over 40 with bat), Shane Watson and Andrew Symonds while Adam Gilchrist could be considered one of the best all-rounders ever. Then there is Green who has the potential to be better then them all ?
Flintoff was a much better batsmen than a slogger and Stokes was a front line bowler until his knee issues.Quick bowling all rounders are very rare
Flintoff was only WC for a couple of years and was basically a slogger anyway while Stokes is hardly a frontline bowler
Jadeja & Shakib are much better cricketers than they ever were
Flintoff and Stokes have 1 game where they made a 50 and took 5 wkts. Green already has that as does Starc. Brett Lee has 3 games where he did that and Cummins twice. Are Flintoff and Stokes really WC all-rounders if they can't make 50 and take a fivefor more than once in long careers46 years is a long time and in that time the Aussies haven't had a top class all rounder, whilst England have had 3.
Yet again we see the Oceanic tendency to overrate their nothing players rear its ugly headFlintoff and Stokes have 1 game where they made a 50 and took 5 wkts. Green already has that as does Starc. Brett Lee has 3 games where he did that and Cummins twice. Are Flintoff and Stokes really WC all-rounders if they can't make 50 and take a fivefor more than once in long careers
Even Shane Warne, Mitchell Johnson, Paul Reiffel and Steve Waugh did it twice ?
Looks like @Qlder a good addition to the forum, he really knows his ****Yet again we see the Oceanic tendency to overrate their nothing players rear its ugly head
Shane Warne the most famous of our 'nothing' players.Yet again we see the Oceanic tendency to overrate their nothing players rear its ugly head