• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

What happened to big spinners of the ball?

Socerer 01

International Captain
Kumble was from that era and didnt spin the ball big. must be just the era/pitches isnt conducive to big spin bowling and more 'subtle' variations. For example, leg spinners in the current era usually get carted around..Hardly any of them - they are a dead breed in test cricket.
when were they a popular breed in test cricket unless you go back to ancient times?
 

Migara

International Coach
Chucking usually massively helps a finger spinner spin the ball more
The counter argument is bowlers who had illegal action were not huge spinners of the ball. Infact guys like Senanayake just got it to deviate from the straight.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The counter argument is bowlers who had illegal action were not huge spinners of the ball. Infact guys like Senanayake just got it to deviate from the straight.
That's not a counter argument, it's a vaguely tangentially-related statement
 
Last edited:

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Ashwin and Lyon spin it quite a bit, but not in Swann, Chauhan or Powar territory.
Have you even seen Ashwin bowl? He barely spins it unless it's a very helpful surface. He's successful due to subtle variations in speed, trajectory and use of the carrom ball. Which also barely turns.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
This is the obvious answer. Surprised it has taken until the second page.

Big spinning deliveries miss the stumps.

Spinners bowl quicker and at the stumps/pads.
This was also the case before DRS . . .

I really don't think it has changed things that much at all tbh
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
This is the obvious answer. Surprised it has taken until the second page.

Big spinning deliveries miss the stumps.

Spinners bowl quicker and at the stumps/pads.
It would definitely be the obvious answer if things had really changed much. I don't think they have.

Murali and Warne were freaks, so I think we can probably largely discount them. The best two spinners in the history of cricket aside, I think the average spinner actually puts more on it now than they did in the past. Ashwin and Lyon definitely put more revs on it than their finger-spinning equivalents in the 90s and 00s - Harbhajan and Hauritz/Miller. Vettori was clearly better than Macewell/Ajaz are but was basically a master of straight breaks, Herath was a subtle undercutter, Yasir and Kaneria turned it a similar amount to each other, Burl leaves Murphy for dead in terms of turn, Taijul turns it more than Rafique, etc etc.

I do think leggies coming through are more likely to rely on variations and deceit than big ripping leg breaks, which is probably due to a mix of DRS and that style being more useful in T20 cricket... but if anything I think finger spinners are ripping it more now than they did in the past. Swann is the only one I can think of who truly breaks the mould on that when you compare players from the same country.

I basically just reject the premise that the statement posed in the question is true to begin with.
 

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
No it's terrible. "I reject the premise of the OP" is all you need. FMD. Is this what we have to look forward to from Ruddick's press releases?
 

Top